Saturday, February 08, 2014

8-Feb-14: With Israelis focused on nature, naturally the jihadists of Gaza focus on Israelis

This weekend is Scarlet South time
February in the northern half of Israel's southern Negev Desert region is the time for a riot of colour. Here's how one travel site describes it:
Every spring, the Negev desert starts to bloom and the ordinarily green landscape is covered with a magnificent carpet of scarlet red anemones. To celebrate this amazing natural wonder, the annual Darom Adom Festival dedicated to the very best of the region takes place during the month of February. Every weekend there will be guided tours, a farmers market, workshops and activities for children, bicycle tours and musical performances in select locations throughout the region. [Source]
Unfortunately February, along with all the other months of the year, is when the terrorism-addicted jihadists of the Gaza Strip celebrate the joys of flinging explosive rockets over the fence into whatever part of nearby Israel they can reach. Sometimes their prayers for victims or damage are answered. Tonight, thank Heavens, they were not, but they keep trying.

At about 4:45 pm today, as the light was failing towards the end of the Sabbath, the dreaded sounds of a different red phenomenon, the Tzeva Adom (Colour Red) incoming missile warning system, were heard throughout the northern south, followed by the sounds of explosion.

So far - as is sadly customary - this has gone almost entirely unreported outside of the usual Israeli channels. The coverage given on the Haaretz web site is stunningly laconic:
A rocket fired from the Gaza Strip exploded in an open area in the Eshkol Regional Council in southern Israel Saturday afternoon. No casualties or damage were reported. Before the rocket hit, residents in two regional councils near Gaza heard rocket alert sirens. [Haaretz]
Over at Times of Israel, they add that the sirens were heard in several towns and kibbutzim of the Sdot Negev region as well as in Eshkol. Incorporating some 16 communities (two kibbutzim, 12 moshavim and two communal settlements), Sdot Negev's population has grown by 55 percent since 2006:  the local education system, atmosphere and rural lifestyle are quoted as attractions in the region's Wikipedia entry. The Eshkol region, which suffers greatly from incoming Gazan rockets, encompasses 15 kibbutzim, 13 moshavim and three other communities.

It's likely there will be a response from Israeli forces, probably tonight, at which point the horror of living in the Israeli communities that are routinely at the receiving end of randomly-flung explosive rockets fired from Gaza into non-military targets will be ignored in the news reports. What makes headlines, as every editor knows, is Israeli military determination and Palestinian Arab victimhood. Stand by.

Friday, February 07, 2014

7-Feb-14: Still wondering how they can imagine in Washington that this is the way to make peace happen

Ambassador Susan Rice and Secretary John Kerry [Image Source: AP]
This past Tuesday, Susan Rice, the National Security Advisor and a former Ambassador to the UN
launched a full-scale Twitter defense of John Kerry, as the secretary of state takes flak for his criticism of Israel. Calling critiques of the U.S. statesman “totally unfounded and unacceptable,” Rice posted four consecutive tweets on Monday night that praised Kerry’s record and affirmed the Obama peace policy concerning Israel and Palestine... "Personal attacks in Israel directed at Sec Kerry totally unfounded and unacceptable..." [New York Daily News]
With Ms Rice's robust defence in mind, David Horovitz who founded and edits Times of Israel published a biting analysis of the current US program for bringing peace to our neighbourhood and of the people driving it. Like many Israelis, he appears to have been struck by Kerry's resort to what he politely terms "an anguished public prediction" of "what awaits Israel if his peace effort fails", reminding us that no matter the substance behind the perception, Israel and not the Arab side will be held to account if the current process ends in failure.
That outcome is, by the way, the overwhelming expectation over here, in case that's not already obvious.

You don't have to agree with every word of David Horovitz' opinion piece to feel comfortable with his conclusions. He ends Wednesday's "The petulant Secretary Kerry" with this:
...Good diplomacy, centrally, involves taking practical steps to marginalize those outside powers that relentlessly foster extremism and terrorism and violence — those enemies of peaceful co-existence — led by Iran. The Obama administration failed the people of Iran when they tried to rise up against their regime. It has failed to protect the people of Syria from slaughter. It has offered no coherent guidance to would-be democrats in Egypt.
And its latest diplomatic “achievement” has set Iran more firmly than ever on its path to nuclear threshold status — allowed to enrich uranium, allowed to improve its technology for enrichment, allowed to continue its weaponization and missile development programs. The Iranians came to the table desperate, and you, Mr. Secretary, sent them home crowing — failing to use your authority and influence to force their admission that they were working toward the bomb and to ensure they were halted. In short, the most profound concerns that Israelis have about the fragility of their security and prosperity stem somewhat less from their failures, Mr. Secretary, than from yours.
And a reminder of something Kerry said at the Munich Security Conference last Saturday that got many people on our side thinking:
"You see, for Israel, there’s an increasing delegitimization campaign that has been building up. People are very sensitive to it. There is talk of boycotts and other kinds of things. Are we all going to be better with all of that? ...The fact is the status quo will change if there is failure [in the peace talks]. So everybody has a stake in trying to find the pathway to success..." [NY Times]
At this point, can we suggest going back to the source and reading how David Horovitz gets to his final paragraphs?

This also seems like an appropriate moment to once again air our own deep concerns about John Kerry's personal and professional approaches (we wonder whether one differs from the other) to terrorism and terrorists. 

We offer some links to several Kerry-related posts published on this blog (not all of them, by any means). Until today, every last one of them, along with a letter we delivered to the State Department, have managed to elicit zero response from the State Department's numerous spokespersons in Washington. (The list here goes from from oldest to newest):
We are as aware as our readers are that we are neither political figures nor elected leaders. But though our criticism sticks to what we regard as humanitarian matters, and even though we speak as ordinary citizens (with this small difference, that our murdered daughter Malki held US citizenship), we continue to believe we are making serious points that even the Secretary of State of the US, or one of his many staffers, ought to take out a moment to answer in a respectful and unspun way.

Thursday, February 06, 2014

6-Feb-14: Gazan rocket attacks on Ashkelon - again

An initial report around 8:20 pm this evening (Thursday) said the dreaded incoming rocket alert siren (the one known as Tzeva Adom, or Color Red) was heard throughout the Hof Ashkelon region. Shortly afterwards, we saw social media posts about explosions being heard in Ashkelon city.

Times of Israel is now saying the terrorists of the Gaza Strip fired a GRAD rocket into southern Israel and that it was intercepted in mid-air by the technologically superb Kipat Barzel/Iron Dome defense system. It's possible a second rocket was fired into the area at the same time, according to Israel's Channel Two News. No sign at this stage of where it crashed to earth or whether it may have been intercepted too.

Earlier today (Thursday), we tweeted that another rocket fired from Gaza had triggered the same incoming-rocket sirens in the same Hof Ashkelon region. That rocket, says Times of Israel, fell harmlessly in an open area where it exploded without injuries or damage.
Three weeks ago, the Iron Dome anti-missile battery team in Ashkelon succeeded in bringing down no fewer than five in-bound Gazan rockets, each of which was intended to destroy or kill anything Israeli and which, fortunately, were prevented from doing that.

On the basis of past experience, what's likely to happen in the wake of tonight's Palestinian Arab attack is fairly clear: the IDF will attack pre-selected focal points of terrorist activity in the Gaza Strip - perhaps a weapons factory, perhaps a training facility - taking maximum care to avoid collateral harm. Then the usual parts of the Israel-phobic news reporting media will, without so much as a single reported syllable about today's rockets over Ashkelon, devote lavish attention to the victimhood of the Gazan Arabs, always the targets of the over-armed Israelis and without a friend in the world. And so on.

Thus the cycle of  violence - we mean the cycle of reportorial violence, better known as lethal journalism - continues in its customary way. This is deeply worrying. At some point, even the IDF demonstrates (as it has in the past) a willingness to avoid perfectly justifiable defensive actions against the terrorists forces in Gaza and on Israel's northern borders just so as to deflect media criticism.

When that happens - and it will - and innocent people are hurt - as they will - the true potential of the practitioners of lethal journalism to cause real, physical harm, becomes manifest. Serious minded people need to get thinking about how to prevent that process. In other words, how to recognize and offset the damage that ideologically-driven reporters, editors, photographers and even caption writers can and do cause via the illegitimate practice of their craft.

Wednesday, February 05, 2014

5-Feb-14: Behind careless throw-away statements of politicians, the overlooked humans and their actual lives

The Borowski family before Evyatar's murder
[Image Source]
Over at The Washington Free Beacon, Senior Writer Adam Kredo has a fine article today that takes up where we left off a few days ago [see our earlier piece: "2-Feb-14: Reflecting on a momentary slip by the Secretary of State"]. It's entitled "Israeli Widow Blasts ‘Insensitive’ Kerry Claim | Kerry claim that no Israelis killed by terror shocks widow". 

We wish the moving words of Tsofia Borovsky, the young Israeli widow whom he interviews, would get the widest coverage. Some extracts:
During a controversial speech over the weekend in Germany, [Secretary of State John] Kerry threatened Israel with economic boycotts and claimed that the Jewish state is enjoying a respite from Palestinian terrorism. “There’s a momentary prosperity, there’s a momentary peace,” Kerry said. “Last year, not one Israeli was killed by a Palestinian from the West Bank.” However, this is untrue. At least five Israelis were murdered by West Bank Palestinians in 2013. Evyatar Borovsky is one of those victims. He was stabbed to death 10 months ago while hitchhiking in the West Bank. He left behind his wife, Tsofia, and five children. It’s a feeling of carelessness and neglecting actual Israeli needs,” Tsofia Borovsky told the Free Beacon on Tuesday when asked about Kerry’s remarks. Borovsky said that Kerry’s comments reveal an inherent insensitivity and apathy to Israel’s security needs, particularly since the murders of Evyatar and others were so greatly publicized... Kerry is “living on a planet of his own,” she said...Other Israeli victims of terrorism also lashed out at Kerry following his remarks. “It’s an important statement that sums up the scale of human loss in numeric form and baldly asserts it didn’t occur,” wrote Arnold Roth, whose 15-year-old daughter Malki was killed when a Palestinian terrorist bombed a Jerusalem pizza shop.“He may not realize even now he did that, and he surely won’t lose sleep over it,” Roth stated on his blog, This OngoingWar. “But it’s distressing that a Secretary of State, with the resources that come with the job, doesn’t check. What does that tell us about the humanity that he invests in such matters?Borovsky said that Israelis living in the West Bank just “want to live peacefully with whoever wants to accept us. We hope for good and better days.”
Please read and pass around the whole Adam Kredo article. It's a meaningful reminder that behind the hideous headlines and self-serving speeches of politicians... there are real people and their real lives.

5-Feb-14: If you plan to carry out a massacre at a Jewish wedding but end up in court without a bullet being fired, are you a national hero yet?

The Ulamei Nof reception hall in Jerusalem's quiet Bayit Vegan
neighbourhood: What could possibly satisfy the blood lust of Palestinian Arab
terrorists better than shooting up a Jewish wedding? [Image: Google Maps]
It's an effort sometimes to remind ourselves what it is that motivates the Islamist terrorists in our midst to keep plotting and planning showcase massacres of their primary targets: unarmed, peace-minded Jewish citizens of the State of Israel.

Times of Israel has just released a breaking news report (it's now Wednesday at 5:30 pm) according to which four East Jerusalem Arabs, likely bearers of Israeli IDs (though the article does not say so), were indicted today in the Jerusalem District Court for preparing to carry out a shooting attack on people attending a popular wedding hall in Jerusalem's Bayit Vegan neighbourhood. (The article says it's in a different neighbourhood, but if the name of the hall is right, then it's Bayit Vegan.) The accused are aged between 19 and 21 and the charges, according to the report, are conspiracy to aid an enemy in wartime. The remand hearing is set for tomorrow.

Two of the would-be killers, residents of Jebel Mukaber, a Jerusalem neighbourhood, were going to dress as haredim, ultra-Orthodox Jews, and enter the hall with two Uzi sub-machine guns concealed under their clothes. They would then open fire on the unsuspecting guests. We have attended numerous happy events at Ulamei Nof (to give it its Hebrew name) over the years. In tune with the large scale of traditional weddings in this part of the world, the hall accommodates 1,500 people.

No one was killed. No blood was shed. So how long, assuming the accused who are currently 100% innocent are convicted, will the four serve behind bars before being put on display in front of a howling crowd of Palestinian Arabs, their arms held aloft by whoever is then their political master, and hailed as heroes?

Sunday, February 02, 2014

2-Feb-14: Reflecting on a momentary slip by the Secretary of State

The funeral of Evyatar Borowski, victim of a terror attack,
father of five, in May 2013 [Image Source]
There are hundreds of us Israeli families who have been twice-damned by those who embrace the usefulness of terror.

First, we're damned through the unbearable loss itself: a child, a parent, a partner, a spouse, a sibling, an aunt, uncle, cousin, friend. We understand that some see no difference between this and a loved one dying of an illness or an accident. But consider that in most bookstores there is a section that deals with coping with grief after a death by accident or illness. A smaller but not insignificant one focuses on how one goes on and tries to recover after losing a loved one to a crime. But literature to help people through the extreme trauma of murder by terrorist with all the various shadings and nuances and political dimensions that this entails? Doesn't exist. Skipping over a lot of the detail that accompanies this comment, let's just say that being a victim of terrorism involves a matrix of complexity and pain that, no matter in which country you live, modern society is just starting to address - at best. Dealing sensitively, respectfully and humanely with it remains a challenge that all too often and in too many places is beyond the capabilities of the responsible authorities.

And secondly we're damned by how politicians deal with us and our losses. From our own personal experiences over the past dozen years since our child's life was stolen from us, we have seen how the usefulness dimension that comes from the utterly cynical exploitation of terrorism's perpetrators.
  • For the Palestinian Arabs - in both the Hamas and the PA strands: the greater the savagery of the barbaric act of terror that put the perpetrator into prison or a grave, the more praiseworthy the lethal deed and the more urgent the need to have his or 'heroism' acknowledged by friends and by foes: a kind of theatre of the macabre.
  • For the governments of foreign states, the unparalleled opportunity to place the two sides in the Arab/Israel conflict on the scales and to find them morally equivalent. Yes, they intone, the militants and activists did what they did but it's time to move on, to seek new understandings, to get closure and set the pain of the past aside. And one man's terrorist is, after all, another's future statesman etc etc. Grand statements that fail entirely to deal with the human damage that is left behind.
  • And for the government of the United States - well, it pains us deeply to say that something baffling has been happening, something that continues to be mostly ignored in the media. The Kerry/Obama push to bring the Palestinian Arabs and the Israelis to some kind of peace table has resulted in a fierce push by the US against the government of Israel to get 104 convicted killers freed. Most have already walked. Not one has expressed remorse, and most have been publicly honoured by the Mahmoud Abbas regime for acts of 'heroism' that are, to be kind, invented. At the same time, Kerry himself, and his spokesteam have pointedly failed to address one very basic, highly relevant and politically embarrassing question. We have asked it here several times in the past half year. Here it is again: Are those 104 killers of elderly pensioners, of Holocaust survivors, of US citizens, of women, of children and of fellow Arabs (a) freedom fighters, (b) political prisoners or (c) terrorists? [Background here.]
Yesterday, in Germany, Secretary of State Kerry, speaking at the Munich Security Conference, making an already bad situation worse, said this:
President Obama and I and our Administration are as committed to this as anything we’re engaged in because we think it can be a game-changer for the region. And as Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed said – he’s here somewhere – to a Paris meeting of the Arab League the other day, spontaneously he said, “You know, if peace is made, Israel will do more business with the Gulf states and the Middle East than it does with Europe today.” This is the difference of 6 percent GDP per year to Israel... not to mention that today’s status quo absolutely, to a certainty, I promise you 100 percent, cannot be maintained. It’s not sustainable. It’s illusionary. There’s a momentary prosperity, there’s a momentary peace. Last year, not one Israeli was killed by a Palestinian from the West Bank. This year, unfortunately, there’s been an uptick in some violence. But the fact is the status quo will change if there is failure. So everybody has a stake in trying to find the pathway to success. [Video here]
Not one Israeli killed by Palestinian terrorists from the West Bank? It's an important statement that sums up the scale of human loss in gross quantitative form - and baldly asserts it didn't occur. He may not realize even now he did that, and he surely won't lose sleep over it. But it's distressing that a Secretary of State, with the resources that come with the job, doesn't check. What does that tell us about the humanity that he invests in such matters?

Had John Kerry or his speech-writer or other staff done some rudimentary fact-checking, they would have come across the details [from this source] of Israeli lives forfeited in the West Bank to acts of hatred and terror during 2013.
  • April 30, 2013: Evyatar Borowski, 31, of Yitzhar, stabbed to death in a terror attack at the hitchhiking post  at Tapuah Junction in the northern West Bank.
  • September 20, 2013: Tomer Hazan, 20, of Bat Yam, lured by a Palestinian co-worker to an open area north of the village of Siniria where he was murdered and his body concealed in a well.
  • September 22, 2013: Staff Sgt. Maj. Gal (Gabriel) Kobi, 20, of Tirat Carmel, killed when shot in the neck at a checkpoint near Hebron's Cave of Patriarchs.
  • October 11, 2013: Seraya Ofer, 61, beaten to death by men wielding metal bars and axes outside his home in the Brosh Habika vacation village in the northern Jordan Valley.
  • November 13, 2013: Private Eden Atias, 19, of Nazereth Illit, stabbed to death in a terror attack on a bus at Afula's central bus station.
(A sixth Israeli, Salah Shukri Abu Latyef, 22, of Rahat, was shot and killed on December 24, 2013 by sniper fire in a shooting attack near the Israel-Gaza border fence. Was the shooter from the West Bank? Does anyone know? Should it matter to the analysis?) 

Perhaps it's mere human error, a momentary slip. Perhaps he meant 2012 when numerous Israeli deaths were the result of terrorist acts emanating not from the West Bank (as if that mattered) but from the Gaza Strip or in Bulgaria, and not 2013. And maybe the fact that Kerry's staff at State still cannot say - after so many months - whether those terrorists they have impelled the Israelis to release are actually political prisoners etc is simply because they're distracted with higher-order matters, have important jobs to do and so on.

We're here to say, even while being ignored, that these issues are about humans and human values and lives. It's frustrating that we find ourselves having to keep reminding public figures, policy makers, parliamentarians of this even as they push ahead with matters of great strategy and significance. But if we choose to ignore the human pain and the social need that are at the heart of these big, weighty matters, what in the end have we achieved?

2-Feb-14: In Australia, evidence that Syria's bloodbath is bringing jihad down under

Melburnians old enough to remember when the international airport was located at Essendon might also recall a large advertising sign on Mt Alexander Road which, as we recall it, proclaimed: "Fly Qantas to the World".

The picture of the drinks coaster on the right is the only souvenir we could find on-line of that rather dated commercial message. Growing up in Australia, there really was the sense that Australia was located somewhere just off to the side of the rest of the world, and that from Melbourne and Sydney you needed an airline to get there.

Times have changed. In the Melbourne Age yesterday, a news article ["Al-Qaeda terrorist threat to Australia"] says what observers paying attention to the rising tide of overt sympathy for Islamist jihad will have noted long ago: Australia today faces challenges not so different to those taxing the minds and resources of authorities in Western Europe and Asia. And while the outcome is still uncertain, the results till now are none too encouraging.

The report quotes the US director of national intelligence, James Clapper, who says terrorist organizations connected to Al-Qaeda, already known to be successfully enticing Australians to join the Syrian bloodbath, have established training camps in Syria to provide a basis for terrorist attacks on Australian soil by returning jihadists. Some key points:
  • "As many as 200 Australians are believed to have travelled to Syria to help rebels trying to topple dictator Bashar al-Assad." 
  • "US intelligence has evidence of ''training complexes'' within Syria ''to train people to go back to their countries and conduct terrorist acts''.
  • "About half of the Australians fighting in Syria are believed to be members of Jabhat al-Nusra. Others have joined the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), an even more militant Islamist group with strong ties to al-Qaeda."
  • A world away from the peaceful Australian
    Gold Coast, Amira Karroum was killed
    alongside her Muslim husband Yusuf Ali
    in Syria [Image Source]
  • Australia's counter-terrorism ambassador Bill Fisher shares the assessment. He says that while "the likelihood of an attack like 9/11 in the West has lessened", the threat of "smaller but nonetheless deadly attacks is very real - hitting bars where Westerners congregate overseas, and other soft targets. In this respect, the threat is worse"...
Australia's awareness of how threats like these translate into tragic outcomes took a startling turn upwards when a jihadi terror attack on a tourist spot in Bali, Indonesia in 2002 cost more than two hundred innocent lives, including those of 88 Australians. [See our contribution in the wake of the tragedy: "11-Oct-07: Kuta beach, five years on"].

Since then, there have been reports and video clips of religious calls to violence by Australian Islamic figures [here, here, here among numerous other instances], violent street demonstrations in Sydney [here, here, here and elsewhere], and front-page reports like this January 2014 article entitled "Amira Karroum was one of many Australians being recruited to fight in Syria" about a young Australian woman who seemed so ordinary, so unremarkable, "the unlikeliest terrorist" until - after her violent death - she is revealed to have written to family:
"Everything is temporary... Islam is my identity. The burqa is my shield. Jannah (the Islamic garden of paradise) is my destination.'' [Telegraph, Sydney, January 18, 2014]
A year ago, Qantas - which faces non-trivial commercial challenges - entered into a strategic partnership with Emirates, a highly successful, well funded airline that is wholly owned by the government of Dubai, a monarchy.

Dubai's government has been wholly controlled by the Al Maktoum family since 1833, entirely untroubled by the need for elections. Qantas, the Al Maktoum business partner, now happily channels much of its Europe-bound traffic via Dubai (concerning which, we posted a string of comments in 2012 and 2013 starting with this one). The volume of passenger and freight traffic between the Middle East and Australia has grown accordingly and is likely to keep doing so. This is going to have an impact. As the Dubai-based on-line journal Arabian Business recently noted:
"Dubai controls strategic trade routes in the world and also more than 65 terminals across the world, including new developments underway in India, Africa, Europe and South America. What this means is, Dubai can influence global trade through these particular ports and have controls over them... Once they implement this and once Dubai starts implementing this in relation to its own trade, what you will see is the beginning of Islamisation that is led by Dubai.” [Arabian Business, October 2, 2013]
Concerns about a Dubai role in the funding of terror get occasional media attention, like this January 2010 piece from The Guardian, "Dubai's dark side targeted by international finance police":
"Fears are intensifying that the emirate has become a global centre for terror funding, money-laundering, drug money and mafia cash..." [The Guardian]
Significant changes have clearly overcome once-isolated Australia's place in the world in the past decade or two. So the notion that religiously motivated terrorists - jihadis - are eyeing far-away places like Australia ought not to be a surprise to anyone. The reality is that neither distant Australia nor anywhere else on earth is far enough away from "the world" to be insulated from the threats that the loathsome jihadists embody.

The warning that hardened Islamist fighters, energized by what they may have seen or done in the slaughter-house that Syria has become, are returning to hospitable Australia with mayhem on their minds ought to continue to get serious attention.