hit counters To rate us on JBlog, please click here.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

11-Nov-09: It's not called paranoia


It's not called paranoia when you really have enemies, and when those enemies have the ability, simply by deciding to do it, to bring chaos, destruction and death into your home at will.
A day after the [IDF] chief of staff warned against an increasing threat from the north, Hizbullah bragged, "All cities, military bases, factories, and settlements in Israel are within the organization's firing range."

Hizbollah's political bureau chief Mahmoud Qomati was responding to the statements made by IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi in the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Tuesday. Ashkenazi said that Hezbollah is armed with tens of thousands of missiles that can even reach Dimona. "Some of them reach a range of 300 km (about 185 miles)," he said. According to the chief of staff, the missiles are ready for use. "There is a paradox. On the one hand, there is quiet, but when you raise your head over the fence, you see strengthening and arming. If Hezbollah carries out an attack to avenge the death of Mughniyeh, this will obligate Israel to respond. This can lead to deterioration." 
For anyone who needs reminding, Hizbullah is financed, trained, equipped, ideologically inspired, and under the complete control, of the Iranian regime.

Sunday, November 08, 2009

8-Nov-09: What the Goldstone report did not do

Here's the central question that the Goldstone commission needed to ask, and didn't. But Dr Moshe Halbertal did, in the current issue of the The New Republic:
"What should Israel do when Hezbollah’s more lethal and accurate missiles strike the center of Tel Aviv, causing hundreds of civilian deaths? It is a well-known fact that these missiles are in Hezbollah’s possession, and, when they are fired, it will be from populated villages in Lebanon."

It's a cogent, elegant and compelling read... just about the exact moral and logical opposite of what Mr Goldstone and his careless crew of partisans achieved. Shame on them. Or as Halbertal puts it so sadly and so well: "The Goldstone Report as a whole is a terrible document. It is biased and unfair. It offers no help in sorting out the real issues."

Amen.

If you know any thoughtful people who genuinely want to understand the fiercely important questions that societies like Israel have to grapple with every day while fighting the terrorists, you could do a lot worse than to point them to Halbertal's essay.

8-Nov-09: Mullahs' Gifts - Some snapshots

Further to yesterday's report: For readers who can't quite visualize what a shipload of terrorist armaments, intended to be launched into towns, schools, hospitals, powerplants, airports and kindergartens looks like when it's seized and dismantled, here are some images courtesy of the Jerusalem Post and the IDF.


 




 

 

 

Note in particular how the terrorists, acting under cover of Iran's official international shipping line IRISL and evidently with its active involvement, concealed the weaponry inside containers that were part-filled with ordinary goods like sacks of polyethylene, a thermoplastic substance that was meant to camouflage the deadly consignment. The polyethylene packs are clearly marked in English "NPC National Petrochemical Company" with a flame logo used by the company and Iran's Oil Ministry.

Haaretz points out that
IRISL is a state-controlled company with a fleet of 95 commercial ships, including 18 container ships. It plies routes to the Far East, the Gulf, Egypt and Europe. And it is one of the companies the UN Security Council listed in its sanctions resolutions against Iran, due to its role in transporting equipment for Tehran's nuclear and missile programs. The company's directors are fully aware of this problem, as are the commanders of the Quds Force - the branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards that is responsible for shipping arms to Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah. They all know that ships with Iranian flags, or that have been leased by IRISL, are likely to draw the attention of western intelligence services and their navies.Therefore, in an effort to divert attention, they loaded hundreds of containers onto a single Iranian ship that sailed to the Egyptian port of Dumyat. The cargo manifest described the shipment as a civilian cargo of polyethylene, a common plastic. At the Egyptian port, the containers were loaded onto Francop, a German ship that flies the flag of Antigua. Its destination was Latakia, a port in Syria, from which the arms would be smuggled overland to Lebanon.

Saturday, November 07, 2009

7-Nov-09: Gifts from our friends, the Mullahs


Friends outside Israel sometimes seem surprised by the pre-occupation we and many Israelis have about the role of Iran in our neighbourhood. But for us Israelis, all the lines connected to terrorist actions in our cities and public places seem to run back to Iran.

This past Wednesday 4th November 2009, an Israeli naval action exposed the ugly and almost-indescribably dangerous hand of the Iranian regime in sowing terror on a scale that people far away don't often grasp.

Naval commandos in an operation called Operation Four Species boarded a ship called the Francop in the eastern Mediterranean Sea without resistance, about 160 kilometres (100 mi) off the coast of Israel, near Cyprus. [There's IDF video footage here.] A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Force (IDF) says the ship was carrying "dozens of shipping containers, carrying numerous weapons, disguised as civilian cargo among hundreds of other containers on board". These originated in Iran and were to be directed to Hizbollah. After the boarding, the Israeli navy directed the ship to the Israeli port of Ashdod where the instruments of death were carefully inspected and inventorized. The ship was then released.

The final talley includes: 9,000 mortar shells, thousands of 107-mm. Katyusha rockets with a range of 15 kilometers, some 600 Russian-made 122-mm. rockets with a 40-km. range; and hundreds of thousands of Kalashnikov bullets.

This was the largest such intercept in Israel's history. It's said to be equivalent to the load of about ten cargo planes.

The IDF says the ship picked up its cargo in Damietta, Egypt where it had Bandar-Abbas, Iran on October 25. The Francop was then set to sail to Limassol, Cyprus and on to Latakia, Syria from where it was to be transferred to Hizbollah. In the interests of full disclosure, Hizbullah says it "categorically denies" any connection to the weapons "that the Zionist enemy claims to have confiscated from the ship." And we know they would never lie.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 forbids the shipments of arms to Hezbollah. This Res. 1701 was a major issue at the end of the Second Lebanon War, and prohibits the delivery of weapons to any entity in Lebanon but the Lebanese government. It was meant to keep Hizbollah from rearming itself with long-range rockets but Hizbollah, according to every Israeli source we know, has about doubled its rocket arsenal since the war, mainly with the help of shipments from Iran and Syria.

For the curious (dare we say naive?) there's also a UN resolution that specifically (Res 1747) prohibits Iran from exporting weapons:
Iran shall not supply, sell or transfer directly or indirectly from its territory or by its nationals or using its flag vessels or aircraft any arms or related materiel, and that all States shall prohibit the procurement of such items from Iran by their nationals, or using their flag vessels or aircraft, and whether or not originating in the territory of Iran...
Israel has filed a complaint with the UN. Before we hold our collective breaths waiting for a meaningful response, note that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon released a report to the UN Security Council two days before the Francop seizure saying the UN takes Israeli allegations about weapons smuggling to Hizbollah seriously, but lacks the ability to independently verify the information. Explaining this, Mr Ban says the government of Lebanon [not a misprint - Lebanon] has not informed the UN of a single incident of weapons smuggling to its territory, whether by land, sea or air. Astonishing but evidently true.

For any of our friends wondering why most Israelis tend to place more trust in their military's intelligence than in international forums, a brief and selective list of past instruments-of-terror seizures:
  • 2002, January: In the Karine A seizure, IDF commandoes took over a 4,000-ton freighter captained by a high-ranking Palestinian Authority naval policeman without a single shot being fired, 300 miles south of Eilat in the Red Sea, between the coasts of Saudi Arabia and Sudan. The Iranian and Russian-made weapons on board included long-range Katyusha rockets with a 20-kilometer (12-mile) range, LAW anti-tank missiles, Sagger anti-tank missiles, long range mortar bombs, mines, sniper rifles, ammunition and more than two tons of high explosives. The Palestinian Authority, led at the time by Araft, was reported to have spent more then $100 million on the arms shipment.
  • 2009, January - While Operation Cast Lead was underway, IAF fighter planes and drones (according to non-Israeli sources) flew 1,000 miles to Sudan to bomb a convoy of trucks smuggling Iranian weapons to Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
  • 2009, January: US naval vessels near Cyprus stopped a ship called the Monchegorsk, chartered by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISIL), and headed for Syria, carrying artillery and tank shells, as well as raw materials to make rockets.
  • 2009, September: During the G20 summit in Pittsburgh, US President Barak Obama, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy exposed another Iranian terror undertaking when they announced together the existence of a secret uranium enrichment facility near the city of Qom which Western intelligence agencies believe was to be used to enrich uranium to illegal military levels for a bomb.
  • 2009, October: Another ship, the Hansa India, which left Iran flying a German flag, was caught by the US military carrying eight containers filled with bullets and industrial equipment that could be used to manufacture weapons. These containers were also intended for Syria, and from there, to Iran's clients in Lebanon, the Hizbollah. One positive aspect of this: the British Treasury on October 12 ordered financial services companies to cease all commercial relations with the Iranian ocean carrier IRISL "amid concerns it has been involved in helping Tehran to develop nuclear weapons.... The order, issued under the Counter Terrorism Act 2008, also applies to Iran's Bank Mellat."
Being sensitive (over-sensitive? hyper-sensitive?) to what the Iranian regime is doing doesn't necessarily make a person anti-Iranian, a war-mongerer or even paranoic. But ignoring what these religiously-inspired fanatics are doing in broad daylight - which is what we see so many individuals and governments doing - is simply beyond our comprehension. Not to mention bordering on the suicidal.

Monday, September 28, 2009

28-Sep-09: Freeing hostages - what will it take?

We were dismayed to read that Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi said a few days ago "There is no way to bring Gilad Shalit back without freeing terrorists".

No way? We presume Ashkenazi's position is neither political nor diplomatic. Consequently, any negotiations or agreements involving the release of Palestinian Arab terrorists, felons and convicted murderers in exchange for the young hostage being held by the Hamas regime for more than three years are entirely outside the perimeter of his portfolio.

As such, his comment was superfluous and inappropriate. There are other means of rescuing Gilad Shalit, well within Ashkenazi's domain. Evidently these are not being pursued. Perhaps it was this failure and an urge to divert attention from it that prompted Ashekenazi's declaration. Whatever the reason, it's a sad note in a distressing public debate.

Reminder: one of the prisoners slated for release, a convicted multi-murderer, is the woman who engineered the massacre that took our fifteen year-old daughter's life. She can barely wait to do the same again: "I'm not sorry for what I did. We'll become free from the occupation and then I will be free from prison."

28-Sep-09: Another intercept

Today was Israel's one and only really holy day: Yom Kippur. It's the day that the entire country, religious and secular alike - put their usual lives on hold and stay home or, for the more religious-minded, spend the day in the synagogue. Streets and roads are empty, the skies are uncommonly clear, and there's a spirituality in the air that is striking.

A perfect day, in other words, for the many armed-to-the-teeth terrorists on our borders to express the depths of their intolerance and hatred.

Last night (Sunday evening) at about the time many Israelis were saying the solemn Kol Nidre prayer, three Qassam rockets were fired into Israel from the Hamas-regime-controlled Gaza Strip. The Qassams crashed somewhere in the Negev. Fortunately no injuries or damage are reported - which was not the intention of the terrorists and their political masters who aspire to Israeli civilian injuries and damage.

Tonight, Monday evening, a mortar shell was fired in the general direction of Israel from Gaza. This one evidently exploded within Gazan territory - meaning the casualties, if any, will probably not be disclosed by Hamas. Shortly afterwards, also this evening, the Israel Air Force spotted more of the same: a rocket launching device somewhere (not yet disclosed) in the Gaza Strip, primed and aimed at Israel and set to fire. IAF planes locked onto the target and the launcher was hit and destroyed.

Just another day in this ongoing war.

Updated stats: Some 55 Gazan rockets and mortar shells have been fired into Israel in the last three months, making for more than 250 since the end of Operation Cast Lead and more than 750 in 2009, according to an IDF statement.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

26-Sep-09: Intercept

Last night (Friday), IDF aircraft intercepted a vehicle transporting rockets to be fired from Gaza into Israel.

The terrorists had just exited the vehicle and were in the process of unloading their weapons when the IAF fired missiles at them. Reuters quotes Islamic Jihad saying that 6 terrorists were in the vehicle: three were killed, 3 seriously wounded. Al Jazeera names the dead as Kamel al-Banna, Mohammed Marshoud and Kamal al-Dahtur, the son of an Islamic Jihad commander killed by the IDF two years ago.

Friday's intercept (captured on video) took place near the Jabalya refugee camp. An IDF report says these specific terrorists had been involved in launching rockets into Israel in recent weeks. Since Israel's Operation Cast Lead campaign against the terrorists of Gaza, the IDF has responded to sporadic Palestinian rocket fire by destroying smuggling tunnels along the Philadelphi Corridor, on the Gaza-Egypt border, while some 300 rockets and mortars have been fired from Gaza into Israel in the same period, 50 in the last ninety days. This was the first Israeli air-strike since the end of Cast Lead in January 2009.

The terrorists are not so easily stopped, as we have learned over the years. This morning, several more Qassam rockets were fired into southern Israel, striking open areas in the Eshkol region, thankfully causing no casualties. Islamic Jihad has vowed revenge for Friday's air strike and this morning's firings are evidently part of that process.

Meanwhile (and of course barely reported) five Gazans were injured today by wild gunshots at the funeral (see picture above) of two of the three Islamic Jihad terrorists.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

17-Sep-09: Human rights, judges and moral hypocrisy

"As long as Judge Richard Goldstone doesn't probe the United States, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka or Turkey, just as he probed Israel, he is not a moral figure. A law is a law only when it applies to everyone and does not discriminate, as Goldstone did."

Ari Shavit, "UN must hold Obama to same standard as Israel"
Haaretz 17th September 2009

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

16-Sep-09: On unity of purpose

We are small geographically and close-knit emotionally. When tragedy strikes, we all grieve as one.

So it has been this week in the wake of Assaf Ramon's death. We had barely recovered from the loss of his heroic, trail-blazing father in the 2002 Columbia space-shuttle disaster. Now in disbelief we are trying to fathom how fate could single out the same family a second time and in so similar a manner.

The same unity of purpose has accompanied the tortuous saga of Gilad Shalit's captivity by Hamas. We have all shared his parents' pain and their urgent desire to bring him home. And we have all been intensely frustrated by our government's egregious failure to rescue him.

How puzzling it is then that Shalit activists have now chosen to shatter that unity. Rather than galvanize more Israelis to demonstrate against our government's inertia, they have chosen to alienate a vast sector of the nation. At their upcoming event they will make bedfellows of the Palestinians whose relatives Hamas seeks to free from Israeli prison in exchange for Shalit's release.

You have to wonder about their sanity. Those with whom the Shalit camp is collaborating are the very Palestinians who raised and educated their terrorist-children. These parents are the ones who infected them with a passion for our own murder.

Moreover, in joining forces with those terror-enablers, Shalit activists are proclaiming that, in their eyes, Israeli victims of terror are inconsequential.

Friday, September 11, 2009

11-Sep-09: It's terrorism day... again

Today being 11th September, there are events of various kinds taking place all over the world to remember the iconic acts of hatred and destruction from eight years ago that forever changed the way Americans think about terrorism.

Here in Israel, we've been given yet another in a long, long series of reminders that this ongoing war of terror is serious, destructive and very dangerous.

Haaretz reports in the past twenty minutes that three Lebanese Katyusha rockets have struck northern Israel. They landed in open fields near Nahariya. Very fortunately, and uncharacteristically, there are no reports of casualties.

Haaretz says: "The rockets were fired from southern Lebanon and Israel Radio has reported that the Israel Defense Forces have launched retaliatory artillery into southern Lebanon. A resident of a northern Kibbutz told Haaretz of the rockets "it was very surprising. We suddenly heard a boom. We are very happy no one was hurt."

Israel's Channel 10 has just reported that an electric tower was struck by one of the rockets.

Monday, September 07, 2009

7-Sep-09: When trading for lives, how much is too much?

Frimet Roth's op-ed article analyzing the price of a rumoured deal for the life of an Israeli hostage held by the terrorists of Hamas appears in today's Jerusalem Post print and online editions.

Netanyahu, it's time for a change of tack
By FRIMET ROTH

Once again, hope for the return of kidnapped soldier Gilad Schalit was raised and then dashed within days. The familiar roller coaster invites the question: Why have our leaders failed to free Schalit?

This year several high-profile missions were carried out to rescue Western hostages. Their success could be instructive for Israel. First, Ingrid Betancourt, a Colombian politician, was freed along with 14 other hostages from jungle captivity in July 2008 in a daring, Hollywoodesque infiltration of guerrilla camps.

Then, on August 5, 2009, former US president Bill Clinton's visit to North Korea scored the surprise release of two American journalists who had been sentenced to 12 years' hard labor by a Pyongyang court. The women were whisked to freedom with Clinton only 20 hours after he landed there.

Next, on August 16, 2009, a visit by US Senator Jim Webb of Virginia to Myanmar secured the return of an American imprisoned there.

Elation over these homecomings has been tempered by concern over the ramifications of the deals cut. As an Associated Press report put it: "Such visits, argue experts, can give regime leaders an aura of respect and recognition that may make it harder for the US to press for sanctions or continue isolation policies aimed at forcing change in everything from humans rights to nuclear power."

ISRAEL IS primed to pay astronomically more for Gilad Schalit. Yet our leaders are indifferent to the deadly ramifications. The release of mass murderers in return for Schalit's freedom poses an irrefutable risk. Yet for three years it has been touted as the single option available.

The day after Schalit's disappearance, his kidnappers offered information about him if Israel agreed to release all female and under-18-year-old Palestinian prisoners.

Since then, while the list of prisoners has grown, no other avenue of rescue has ever been shown, let alone rumored, to be on the cards. Not even the massive Operation Cast Lead produced evidence of any rescue attempt.

Instead, Hamas has been sitting pretty all these years. The only pressure exerted on it has been to delete several prisoners from its list and to approve the exile of several others after release. Moreover, the sine qua non of any deal, the release of all female prisoners, has never been challenged. It is accepted by all as a compassionate stipulation.

One of those women is Ahlam Tamimi. This journalist-cum-university student was involved in the reconnaissance and planning of the August 9, 2001 terror attack on Jerusalem's Sbarro restaurant.

That morning, Tamimi, along with a suicide bomber and 10 kg of explosives, took a taxi from Ramallah. At the checkpoint between east and west Jerusalem, her accomplice, Izzadin al-Masri, got out and walked past the IDF soldiers empty-handed. Tamimi remained in the taxi, passing through unsearched, while the explosives lay beside her.

Once past the checkpoint, Tamimi rejoined Masri on foot. The pair then walked toward the center of Jerusalem. Tamimi carried a camera and the two conversed aloud in English to pass for tourists.

When they reached Sbarro, the target Tamimi had selected, she reminded Masri to wait 15 minutes before detonating the bomb. She didn't want to suffer any scratches herself.

At 1:50 p.m., Masri obeyed Tamimi. The ensuing inferno took the lives of 15 innocent Jewish men, women and children.

There were actually seventeen victims: One of the dead was pregnant. Another woman has been in a coma ever since.

My 15-year-old daughter, Malki, never made it to the hospital. She was among the first to die.

Tamimi was tried and sentenced in 2004 to 16 life terms. In an interview from her cell she said: "I am not sorry for what I did. We'll become free from the occupation and then I will be free." She smiled when an interviewer informed her that she had killed eight children, three more than she had presumed.

Does this sound like a weak, pitiable female prisoner?

LAST WEEK, when Schalit's liberation appeared imminent, we learned that a German mediator was activated at Israel's invitation. He has been commuting to Egypt since mid-July and is pressuring Hamas to clinch this deal.

Pressuring Hamas? Does a terrorist organization need to be cajoled to accept the return of hundreds of its hit men in return for one captive? Israel, on the other hand has been an amenable, or rather eager, party to the negotiations from the outset. Our politicians have been doggedly laying on the hard-sell rhetoric to convince us that the only choice is releasing mass murderers or losing Schalit.

"At this point we should not worry about the released terrorists going back to acts of terror and murder," wrote Eitan Haber on Ynet last week. "Findings from the previous swaps show that only a few go back to terrorism."

Haber is utterly wrong. Thirty of the terrorist attacks perpetrated since 2000 were committed by terrorists freed in deals with terror organizations. Their terrorism killed 177 persons and wounded hundreds of others, permanently disabling some.

Supreme Court Justice Edmund Levi eloquently confirmed those findings. In rejecting a past petition against a prisoner release, he wrote: "This is not the very first time that by virtue of agreements it signed, the State of Israel frees terrorists who sowed death and destruction in our midst. After every such prisoner release, the hope reverberated in many hearts that this time a change would ensue... this hope was in vain, and it might be more fittingly defined as a false illusion. If we needed further proof... one can find it in the bloody events that have accompanied us since October 2000. Many of those whom Israel had in the past set free participated in these horrific events."

It is time Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu abandoned Ehud Olmert's misguided lead. Alternative strategies should at long last be resolutely pursued.

Schalit must be freed now. Cold-blooded mass murderers - never.

The writer and her husband founded the Malki Foundation (www.kerenmalki.org) in their daughter's memory. Malki Roth was murdered in the Sbarro restaurant massacre in 2001. The foundation provides concrete support for Israeli families of all faiths who care at home for a special-needs child.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

29-Jul-09: Is it naïvete? Is it ignorance? Is it confusion?

The good people at Honest Reporting ask:

"According to a recent New York Times article, Hamas has shifted from “rockets to culture war” in their goal to win popular support through “cultural initiatives and public relations.” Additionally, the Globe & Mail, Canada’s "paper of record," made similar statements recently claiming by some unknown veracity that Hamas is moving “towards moderation.”

"Are these media outlets woefully naïve or willfully ignorant?

"If Hamas did truly adopt non-violent tactics, could the Times and the Globe please explain why late last week, two Hamas terrorists were killed while handling a bomb which was being prepared for use against Israeli forces? Could they explain why Hamas is currently digging tunnels next to UN facilities under the assumption the IDF will not target them during a future conflict? Could they explain why Hamas summer campers recently re-enacted the abduction of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit and why its charter still calls for the destruction of Israel?"

And we ask:

Why does the Foreign Affairs Committee of Britain's House of Commons say in a report issued this past weekend (reiterating a call they made two years ago) that they want to initiate talks with Hamas? Is this because they are unable to share the view of the EU and the government of the US that Hamas is an organization of terror and terrorists? Are they unaware of those ongoing acts of terror, of Hamas' unrelenting hostility to Israel and Israelis, to the ongoing campaign of hostilities, kidnappings and acts of pure terror against Israel's civilian population?

What is it about terrorism that so confuses people?

Saturday, June 13, 2009

13-Jun-09: Mostly unreported, another rocket attack today on Israel

Another Qassam attack on Israel today: only one news source, Haaretz, bothered to report on this. Today's Qassam fired from Hamas-controlled Gaza landed in Israel's western Negev, near Kibbutz Alumim according to A7. Fortunately there are no reports of casualties or damage.

UPDATE Sunday 14-Jun-09: YNet is reporting that IDF forces attacked and bombed two smuggling tunnels in the southern part of the Gaza Strip early today (Sunday). The tunnels were hit but no casualties are reported. As we noted, almost no one in the media covered the Sabbath Qassam attack.

Friday, June 12, 2009

12-Jun-09: Horsemen of the apocalypse?

Yuval Diskin, the head of the Israel Security Agency, the Shin Bet, warned recently that the reduction in jihadist rocket fire from Hamas-ruled Gaza into Israel is a tactical maneuver, accompanied by an increase in attacks on the security barrier that keeps them in and away from Israeli towns and communities.

At the time, Diskin was quoted saying that Hamas is "continuing to build up its forces and increase the range and quality of its rockets as well as its capability to attack planes and tanks." It has been widely reported in Israel that the Hamas regime continues to improve and widen the many tunnels it has dug under the security barrier, facilitating attacks on Israel and Israelis.

Demonstrating the accuracy of the assessment, a large-scale infiltration attack and kidnapping attempt by Palestinian Arab Gazan terrorists, some in vehicles, some on horses, was foiled by Israeli forces this past Monday.

A dozen or more Palestinian jihadists were spotted just after dawn, under cover of the early morning fog, attempting to get past the separation barrier near the Karni Crossing. On closer inspection, they were founded to be equipped with several booby-trapped vehicles, suicide belts and about five booby-trapped horses laden with bombs. [Certainly not the first time booby-trapped horses -- or booby-trapped women or booby-trapped children -- have been deployed by the "heros" of the jihad.]

The terror attack was accompanied by the firing of mortar shells. A gun battle ensued. Several cars, several hourses and at least one truck loaded with explosives were blown up. Palestinian Arab sources in Gaza said four of their terrorists were killed. Al-Jazeera says at least 12 Palestinian Arabs were wounded. IDF helicopters played a role, attacking the jihadists and their emplacements. In the aftermath, the IDF closed the Karni Crossing and the Nahal Oz fuel depot.

Following Monday's jihadist attack on the Karni Crossing, terrorists opened fire again yesterday morning (Thursday) in the same vicinity; fortunately no reports of casualties this time. A day earlier, Wednesday, the Security Cabinet gave the IDF authority to respond to any attack against Israel from Gaza.

For their part, the Hamas thugocracy left little doubt about what they support and what they condemn. "Those martyrs and this blood will not break the will of the Palestinian people," said chief Hamas jihadist Ismail Haniyeh, quoted in Haaretz.

With some weariness we point out that the closing of the Karni Crossing was reported in several places with no mention of the large-scale terrorist attack that preceded and triggered it. For many "news" sources, the power of a narrative that has Israelis oppressing the defenceless Gaza population is just too compelling to allow truth and facts to intrude.

For the record, it is the Kerem Shalom crossing where most food and humanitarian aid items pass through from Israel to Gaza. (Karni's activity is more or less limited these days to a conveyor belt for wheat.) Yigal Palmor of the Israeli foreign ministry stated Israeli policy succinctly: "As long as the border crossings are not secure there is no point in even raising the question of their opening."

Saturday, June 06, 2009

6-Jun-09: Facing the jihadists - a postscript

Further to our posting earlier today entitled "6-Jun-09: Facing the jihadists and their nuclear arsenals", an Associated Report filed yesterday puts some details to the general mounting concerns about the ongoing nuclear adventurism of the jihadists in Iran and Syria.

By GEORGE JAHN, Associated Press Writer – Fri Jun 5, 5:14 pm ET
VIENNA – The U.N nuclear agency on Friday reported its second unexplained find of uranium particles at a Syrian nuclear site, in a probe launched by suspicions that a remote desert site hit by Israeli warplanes was a nearly finished plutonium producing reactor.
In a separate report, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran continued to expand its uranium enrichment program despite three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions meant to pressure Tehran into freezing such activities. And it said the growing pace of enrichment is causing it to review its inspection routine so that it can maintain oversight of the process.
Iran and Syria are under IAEA investigation — Tehran, since revelations more than six years ago of undeclared nuclear activities that could be used to make weapons, and Syria after Israel bombed a structure in 2006 said by the U.S. to be a reactor built with North Korean help.
But the agency has made little progress for over a year in both cases, and both of the restricted reports made available to The Associated Press on Friday essentially confirmed the status quo — stonewalling by both countries of the two separate IAEA probes.

6-Jun-09: Facing the jihadists and their nuclear arsenals

The opinion piece below, written by one of this blog's two editors, was published this week in the Kalgoorlie Miner (Western Australia) in response to a syndicated op-ed column entitled Koreans, Israelis and Nukes, by a London-based military commentator Dr Gwynne Dyer, published in several dozen newspapers in different parts of the world during the week of 1st June, 2009.

Bravery, Cowardice and Terrorists
Arnold Roth

Coming of age in Melbourne during the fifties and sixties turns out to have been an invaluable precursor to living, as my wife and I and our children do, in the Middle East.

Our apartment is in the suburbs of Jerusalem. We moved here in the late eighties when our oldest was ten. Making our home here was and is literally the fulfillment of a dream.

My mother and father were among the statistical fly-speck of Europe’s Jews who survived what the Nazis and their many helpers served up to them. But in saving their own lives, they lost almost everything else to the Third Reich’s whirlpool of hatred: their parents, their homes, their freedom, their youth.

But not their future. Neither of them managed to spend a single day inside a high school. But they dedicated themselves as parents to ensuring my brother and I missed out on none of life’s privileges. They bestowed a powerful optimism, a willingness to love life and get on with it on us and – along with other Jewish survivors like them – on an entire generation of post-Holocaust children.

Life was too comfortable and safe for me at the time to see this for the extraordinary life-affirming bravery that it is.

***
In August 2001, our fifteen year old daughter died.

Malki was two when we moved to Israel. Though she had no time for or interest in politics, she grew up with a deep personal appreciation of her people’s history, and of the dramatic grace and grandeur of its troubled, beautiful land.

She developed a passion for working with special-needs children, and grabbed every opportunity to be close to them. She embraced life, and faced it with a wide and lovely smile. During the summer between tenth and eleventh grades, she volunteered at a camp on the shores of the Sea of Galilee that challenged children with disabilities. She adored the experience. We have some gorgeous photos that were given to us by her friends.

A day or two after returning home, she and her best friend and thirteen other people, most of them children and women, were blown to pieces by a powerful guitar-case bomb carried into a pizza restaurant in the centre of the city by a religious fanatic in the service of Hamas jihadism.

***
Israel, whose national consciousness was formed in large part by the horrifying experiences of my parents’ generation, is grappling today with life-and-death threats funded, ideologically inspired and in large measure equipped by one source: the Islamic Republic of Iran.

For people living far from these events, it must be hard to keep track of who Hamas, Hizbullah, Islamic Jihad, Fatah and the other terror organizations are and the differences among them. Reading about their political and ideological aspirations, it must be doubly confusing for an observer located far away to confront the perverse morality that characterizes their actions: the notion that attacks on women and children, attacks on bus stops and restaurants, attacks on defenseless and unarmed non-combatants – that these are the highest quality attacks, the greatest achievement of jihadism. In all the years of their terrorist thuggery, they have rarely attacked soldiers or military installations.

Gwynne Dyer’s smooth, confident tones are those of an informed observer. As a military analyst and published commentator on international relations, Dr. Dyer must have reviewed the open-source intelligence on Iranian missiles, on years of Iranian disinformation in the face of nuclear watchdog inspections, on Iranian holocaust-denial. He must know of the central role Teheran plays today, this month, this morning, in equipping the terrorists of Gaza and Southern Lebanon with missiles and explosives whose sole function is to be lobbed anywhere in the direction of Israeli homes, shopping centres and schools.

Despite knowing these things, his slightly bizarre thesis is that Israelis like me have nothing to fear from the Iranians and their nuclear program, and if we think differently, it’s because of our hysteria. We need to act more like the South Koreans, whose territory for decades has been patrolled and protected by tens (and sometimes hundreds) of thousands of American service personnel, so that the world can become a better, saner place.

***

The analysis looks and feels very different when it’s happening to you and to those you love.

Very much unlike South Korea, the land in which I live is regularly under attack from people driven by a religious or ideological (or both) indoctrination based on a profound and absolute hatred of everything that characterizes my neighbours and me. So deep, so imponderable is that hatred, that they are willing to send human bombs into our midst, knowing this will cost the lives of some of their own children.

They do it, we have learned, because the joy of seeing their enemy suffer eclipses the pain of their losses.

Nothing I learned from my parents or from my murdered daughter has helped me understand that mentality. The gulf between the society we are building here in Israel and the one the jihadists want to create is expressed pointedly by a quotation ascribed to an Iranian mullah:
“We have the patience needed to destroy the Jews and spread Islam throughout the world. After all, we have been weaving carpets for thousands of years. The decadent West doesn’t understand what patience is.”

In the face of this kind of threat, you need to choose your role models and your values very carefully. Gwynne Dyer expresses disdain for Israeli concerns about a powerful, committed, exceedingly well-equipped enemy with a clear and explicit agenda.

On behalf of those of us living in the cross hairs, there are some lessons I wish he and some other experts like him would learn. Sometimes, as I have found, those insights can come from unlikely places.

Friday, May 15, 2009

15-May-09: What's really being done to Palestinian Arab Christians?

The visit of Pope Benedict XVI to this neighbourhood over the past five days has elicited the usual rush of Israel-critical comment. Frequently based on very partial and distorted views of what actually happens here, there is something sadly consistent about the report flow - an insistent refusal to understand what is being done to the non-Moslem minorities among the Arabs. And that certainly includes among the Palestinian Arabs.

We have copied several Khaled Abu Toameh articles here in the past. He writes with an authentically Palestinian Arab voice, and as a proud Moslem. But unlike the thong of voices emanating from that demographic, Abu Toameh's insights are original and, for most observers, counter-intuitive. Meaning he writes what he believes makes sense, even if it runs strongly counter to the political-correctness winds that are such a problem in this complicated zone.

[To get a sense of what we mean, have a look at Ben White's sadly typical bash of Israel in the Guardian on Monday of this week: "Can the Pope help Christian Palestinians". "A vast majority of locals see the Israeli occupation as the primary reason" for all the problems, says White, expressing the reflexive hostility of many of his reporting brethren.]

In his piece below, written for the Hudson Institute, Khaled Abu Toameh analyzes what's being done to Christian society, and the wrongness of ascribing blame to Israel for the striking drop in the numbers of Christian Arabs living under Palestinian Authority control.

The Beleaguered Christians in Bethlehem
Khaled Abu Toameh, May 2009
Christian families have long been complaining of intimidation and land theft by Muslims, especially those working for the Palestinian Authority.

Many Christians in Bethlehem and the nearby [Christian] towns of Bet Sahour and Bet Jalla have repeatedly complained that Muslims have been seizing their lands either by force or through forged documents.

In recent years, not only has the number of Christians continued to dwindle, but Bethlehem and its surroundings also became hotbeds for Hamas and Islamic Jihad supporters and members.

Moreover, several Christian women living in these areas have complained about verbal and sexual assaults by Muslim men.

Over the past few years, a number of Christian businessmen told me that they were forced to shut down their businesses because they could no longer afford to pay "protection" money to local Muslim gangs.

While it is true that the Palestinian Authority does not have an official policy of persecution against Christians, it is also true that this authority has not done enough to provide the Christian population with a sense of security and stability.

In addition, Christians continue to complain about discrimination when it comes to employment in the public sector. Since the establishment of the Palestinian Authority 15 years ago, for example, not a single Christian was ever appointed to a senior security post. Although Bethlehem has a Christian mayor, the governor, who is more senior than him, remains a Muslim.

As a Muslim journalist, I am always disgusted and ashamed when I hear from Christians living in the West Bank and Jerusalem about the challenges, threats and assaults that many of them have long been facing.

The reason why I feel like this is because those behind the assaults and threats are almost always Muslims.

For decades, the delicate and complicated issue of relations between Muslims and Christians in the Holy Land was treated by Palestinians as a taboo. Most Palestinians chose to live in denial, ignoring the fact that relations between the Muslim majority and the tiny Christian minority [about 10%] have been witnessing a setback, particularly over the past 15 years.

On the eve of Pope Benedict XVI's visit to the Holy Land, a Christian merchant told me jokingly: "The next time a pope comes to visit the Holy Land, he will have to bring his own priest with him pray in a church because most Christians would have left by then."

Indeed, the number of Christians leaving Bethlehem and other towns and cities appears to be on the rise, according to representatives of the Christian community in Jerusalem.

Today, Christians in Bethlehem constitute less than 15% of the population. Five or six decades ago, the Christians living in the birthplace of Jesus made up more than 70% of the population.

True, Israel's security measures in the West Bank have made living conditions more difficult for all Palestinians, Christians and Muslims alike. But to say that these measures are the main and sole reason for the Christian exodus from the Holy Land is misleading.

If the security fence and the occupation were the main reason, the Palestinian territories should by have been empty of both Muslims and Christians. These measures, after all, do not distinguish between Christians and Muslims.

On the other hand, it is also incorrect to assume that the Christians are leaving only because they are afraid of their Muslim neighbors. Christians are leaving because of the poor economy, and because they no longer feel secure in their homes. But they are also leaving because most of them, if not all, find it easier to merge into Christian-dominated societies in the US, Canada, EU and Latin America, where many of them already have relatives and friends.

In fact, Christians began leaving the Holy Land long before Israel occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1967. But the number of those moving to the US and Canada has sharply increased ever since the Palestinian Authority took control over Bethlehem and other Palestinian villages and cities. When the second intifada erupted in September 2000, Christian leaders said they were "terrified" by the large number of Christians who were leaving the country.

Ironically, leaders of the Palestinian Christians are also to blame for the ongoing plight of their people because they refuse to see the reality as it is. And the reality is that many Christians feel insecure and intimidated because of what we Muslims are doing to them and not only because of the bad economy.

When they go on the record, these leaders always insist that Israel and the occupation are the only reason behind the plight of their constituents. They stubbornly refuse to admit that many Christians are being targeted by Muslims. By not talking openly about the problem, the Christian leaders are encouraging the perpetrators to continue their harassment and assaults against Christian families.

And then the day will really come when the pope, on his next visit to the Holy Land, will not find any Christian to welcome him.‭‮

Friday, May 08, 2009

8-May-09: A Mother's Day introspection

Mother's Day takes place on various dates in different places. This weekend, it's honoured in the US and elsewhere. A good moment to pause and think about the role of mothers in certain societies - and what it means for the rest of us

National Geographic Television recently aired a segment dealing with the appalling phenomenon of mothers who willingly, joyfully, send their children to their deaths. It may not exactly shock you to know that the focus of the TV segment was mothers living in a specific Islamic society where they are deeply entrenched personally, politically and ideologically in the Hamas narrative.

Click below to see and hear Mother Mariam (aka Mariam Farhat aka Um Nidal), a jihadist mother from hell. One of many.



Care to know more about this hatred-driven person? To understand what kind of impact she and others like her can have on generations of innocent children? The interview reveals little. It fails, for instance, to point out that no fewer than three of this woman's sons ended their lives as terrorist/murderers. And she wants the others to follow.

One son, Muhammad Farahat, died after murdering five students in the Jewish community of Atzmona, where they were listening to a lecture. Throwing grenades and spraying the unarmed students with automatic weapon fire, he killed five and wounded 24 others. Killing unarmed students is one of the highest callings in the Jihadist suicide/murder pantheon - so long as those students are Jewish. Mummy helped him make a farewell video, and danced with joy while sending him off.

A second son, Nidhal Farhat, was killed with five other Hamas terrorists while preparing a bomb-laden remote-piloted drone for terror attacks on Israeli civilian settlements.

A third, Rawad Farahat, died in a truck carrying Qassam rockets to a terrorist launching site. Palestinian-Arab terrorists like him have launched hundreds of Qassam rockets into Israeli civilian areas to the applause of their mothers and religious leaders.

As one commentator points out, describing these jihadist thugs as martyrs mischaracterizes the true nature of their deeds and the way they died.

Oh, and did we mention she is an elected parliamentarian for the ruling Hamas party in the Gazan Palestinian legislative council? Or that she was mobbed by supporters after her 2006 election victory? Or that she believes in peace?

Yes, she believes in peace. And here's how she defines it:
"Peace means the liberation of all of Palestine, from the [Jordan] to the [Mediterranean] Sea. When this is accomplished — if they want peace, we will be ready. They may live under the banner of the Islamic state. That is the future of Palestine that we are striving towards... I sacrificed [my sons] for a greater cause. For Allah, who is more precious than them. My son is not more precious than his god, he is not more precious than the places holy to Islam, and he is not more precious than his homeland or his Islam. Not at all."
The evidence of what jihadist terror in all its various guises does and wants is out there for anyone who wants to see it. But as National Geographic sadly demonstrates, you can look. You can listen. You can think you have it figured it out. But you can still miss the whole point. Even while pointing out that the woman "is not yet done" and "wants her other children to follow the same path", the National Geographic video segment interviewing Mother Farhad repeats the word "martyr" multiple times.

But it fails to pronounce the word 'terrorism' even once.

Happy mothers day.

Friday, May 01, 2009

1-May-09: The murder of your child gets you thinking like this

The murder of our daughter has made us more sensitive than most to the way the media, and those who explain things to the media, think about the death of children. The op-ed below appears in both the print and online editions of today's Haaretz.

The power of numbers
By Frimet Roth

"Malki will never become just another number," we vowed, days after our daughter was murdered in the August 2001 terror attack on Jerusalem's Sbarro pizzeria. We never imagined that she could ever fade into less than "just a number."

Yet that is what has happened to her in the mindset of Israel's spokesmen...

Like Malki, the scores of Israeli children murdered since October 2000 have been forgotten. Their precise number has never been tallied by our government, let alone publicized in the international media.

Deflated statistics of Israeli children murdered by Palestinians in this millennium have been widely disseminated on Palestinian Web sites. There they are cited in comparison with the far greater numbers of Palestinian children killed in this conflict.

The refrain "numbers speak louder than words" is now being brandished obsessively in columns and reports about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the number of Gazan civilians killed in Operation Cast Lead, the number of Gazan houses destroyed, the number of Gazan women and children injured. Their impact on world opinion is immeasurable.

Here is what Prof. Rashid Khalidi wrote about numbers in an op-ed piece that appeared in the New York Times this past January, while the Gaza campaign was underway:
"But the numbers speak for themselves: Nearly 700 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed since the conflict broke out at the end of last year. In contrast, there have been around a dozen Israelis killed, many of them soldiers."
There is no doubt that Palestinian numbers have won many hearts and minds. The recent resurgence of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism - January and February saw a sharp rise worldwide - is, in many instances, testimony to that.

The numbers cited by the Palestinians dodge issues and trump logic. They obviate the need to explain how Israel is supposed to react to attacks on its civilians without incurring the ire of "human rights" defenders. Those numbers ignore the dilemma Israel faces when its enemy hides in hospitals and in apartment buildings filled with women and children and other noncombatants.

But the numbers "game" is not played for fun and we can no longer afford to ignore it. Israel's security depends to a large extent on how it scores in this unsavory game. Unfortunately, our spokesmen have been derelict in their duty by failing to arm themselves with fighting numbers.

The murders of 144 innocent Israeli children, targeted while they played, ate, studied, hiked or rode buses to and from school over the past eight years, are a potent verbal weapon. Not one of those children was armed, not one was caught in soldiers' crossfire, not one was used as a human shield by Israeli soldiers.

These 144 children provide a context for much of the IDF's activities since terrorism became a major threat in October 2000. This number explains the checkpoints, the security fence, the arrests, and even Operation Cast Lead - all of which have ignited venomous vilification of Israel. Against the backdrop of our murdered children, Israel's conduct can fairly be viewed as not only justified, but unavoidable.

Our phone calls and written inquiries to the appropriate government bodies failed to yield publication of the forgotten number. The tally was reached, rather, by reading the complete list of terror victims posted on the Web site of Israel's Foreign Ministry and counting the children one by one.

Why our diplomats have chosen to conceal the children bombed, shot and stabbed to death by Palestinians remains a conundrum. But it is not too late to rectify the error.

In numbers, at times, there can be strength.

...
Frimet Roth is a freelance writer in Jerusalem. Her daughter Malki was murdered at the age of 15 in the Sbarro restaurant bombing (2001). She and her husband founded the Malki Foundation, which provides concrete support for Israeli families of all faiths who care at home for a special-needs child.

Please help us honour Malki's memory, and re-affirm the humanity of the victims. Keren Malki, a respected not-for-profit which we created in 2001 provides practical support for thousands of Israeli Jews, Christian, Moslems, Druze and others. They all have in common their desire to care at home for a special-needs child. Without Keren Malki's help, many of these children might otherwise be placed in institutions. Keren Malki is uncommonly efficient, and dedicated to a cause for which there is almost no other source of support in Israeli society - the need to empower parents who make the decision to care at home, and not via an institution, for a child with serious disabilities. You can learn more, and give your support, at www.kerenmalki.org

Thursday, April 16, 2009

16-Apr-09: Jihadists for peace

Passover has just ended, and with it two weeks of relative quiet from our rocket-hurling, jihadist neighbours in Gaza. YNet says one of their Qassam missiles was fired in the general direction of Kibbutz Magen in the early evening hours, landing near the border fence and exploding without any serious effect.

The most recent of the thousands of rocket attacks by Gazan Palestinian terrorists occured on April 1, when they fired another three Qassam rockets into Israel. A woman and a teenage girl were injured then as they rushed to shelter after the incoming-missile siren sounded.

This past Monday, in a failed terror attack, a booby-trapped fishing boat exploded near an Israel Navy vessel off the northern Gaza Strip coast. And yesterday, Wednesday, the authorities in Egyp uncovered some 900 kilograms of TNT hidden in 18 sacks near Egypt's border with Gaza.

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

8-Apr-09: An especially apt time to cherish freedom

As the Jewish world makes its last-minute preparations to honour and commemorate our national festival of freedom, we received a timely personal reminder yesterday of how our own child's freedom was stolen by a terrorist group's calculated act of mass-murder.

On Tuesday, here in Jerusalem, the local Magistrates Court considered a compensation claim by the family of our teenage daughter's murderer. Fortunately we were completely unaware of it.

Izz a-Din al-Masri was a religious fanatic from a well-to-do Palestinian Arab family. A guitar case on his back filled with explosives and nails, he was brought into the center of Jerusalem by a well-organized gang arranged by the Hamas jihadists. When he went to his 72 virgins on 9th August 2001 on the premises of the Sbarro restaurant that used to be in the center of Israel's capital city, he took fifteen lives - most of them Jewish children and Jewish women, which was precisely (and remains precisely) the Hamas plan. More than 130 other innocent victims were maimed and wounded by this savage act of "freedom" and "national self-determination".

This being a free and democratic society, the family of the Hamas jihadist sued the state of Israel for damages after their house, which was used by their son to prepare for the massacre at Sbarro, was demolished by judicial order. Media reports said they claim the house was destroyed in a negligent manner.

It's reported (but not widely) that the presiding judge, Yoel Tzur, held the demolition of the al-Masri home was "an appropriate and legal response to the murderous attack. Under wartime laws, including those laws accepted by the international community, a country may demolish property in order to deter attacks... Israel's destruction of terrorists' property can be defined as a method of deterrence".

As to whether the house was destroyed in a negligent manner, the court found that the army took extra precautions and had carried out a "dry run" of the demolition ahead of the real event to ensure the process would run smoothly. The court held that the jihadist's family was given plenty of time to remove their belongings from the building, and rejected their claim for compensation.

We want to point out here that a woman called Ahlam Tamimi, who is serving multiple life-sentences for her role in the Sbarro massacre and in the killing our 15 year-old daughter Malki, is at the top of the Hamas list of "women and children" terrorists that was said to be accepted by the recently-replaced Olmert government in the context of a deal to free Gilad Shalit. There is a very real likelihood that she will soon be free. Hamas has held the young Israeli hostage for the past 1,000 days as a lever to get their jihadists out of Israeli prisons... and back into the cafes, buses and playgrounds of Israeli society where they can again advance the principles of savagery and hatred-driven murder.

Given the amount of widespread confusion and disinformation about terrorists and their agendas, this week's denial of monetary damages to the al-Masris and the continued incarceration of the mass murderer Tamimi are likely to continue to appear on Israel-bashing lists of Israeli "human rights offences".

When we sit down to the festive seder meal tonight, we will be remembering the Jewish people's long struggle for freedom, and the traditional Jewish values that underpin both that struggle and the nation-state that they eventually enabled to be re-established.

Thursday, April 02, 2009

2-Apr-09: The murder of children - the positives, the negatives

More appalling acts of terror from the Palestinian Arabs in this ongoing war: two Israeli boys, one either 13 or 16 according to conflicting reports, and one 7, are attacked today by a Palestinian Arab wielding an axe and a strain of religious extremism that defies comprehension. The older of the boys is dead. The younger is in a Jerusalem hospital being treated for serious injuries.

Most Israeli school-children are on vacation now in the days before the festival of Passover which begins next week.

The BBC quotes Israeli sources saying that the responsible parties are "the military wing of Islamic Jihad" and an entity they call "Imad Mughniyeh Group" (an invented title to anyone paying attention to these things). The jihadists had no special difficulty getting access to the Jewish children since, despite a history of previous jihadist murders in the vicinity, theirs is a community which chooses to have no protective fence around its perimeter. The optimism of that ongoing open-door policy is hard for us to understand.

The moral horror of an axe-bearing man with murder and mayhem on his mind is a clear and unambiguous thing for most of us... but not necessarily when you are a media reporter and it's Jewish children who are damaged, and Palestinian Arabs who are the killers.

Consider.

A Palestinian media source applies the customary code language in reporting that "one settler was killed and another injured when a Palestinian man attacked Israeli settlers". To know that the victims were children, you would have needed to check elsewhere.

A Reuters report, differing from the BBC, acribes the act to "Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, a militant group in Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement". Unable to report on an act of terror on its own savage terms, Reuters connects the murder/maiming to "crimes of occupation".

AFP, true to its snarling, Israel-bashing form, says - with not an ounce of substantiation - that "Bat Ayin is one of the most radical settlements in the occupied West Bank. Most of its 1000-odd residents are hardline settlers who prevent Palestinians from even entering the settlement boundaries". This is what the readers of news channels sourcing AFP's syndicated reports evidently need to hear when a Jewish 13 year old is chopped to death and a Jewish seven year old is slashed and bashed.

A Tim Butcher story in The Telegraph (UK) calls this an "incident" that "appears to fit a long-running series of attacks involving Israelis, who in breach of international law established settlements on occupied Palestinian land, and Arabs, demanding their land back". The particular international law that renders the community a "breach of international law" is not specified by the editors of The Telegraph. The complexities and details of Israeli national rights in their historic homeland long ago ceased to be a matter worth examining when it comes to common editiorial practice. It's perhaps worth pointing out what The Telegraph's fact-checkers don't; Bat Ayin where the boys were attacked today is part of a region called Gush Etzion. This was indeed occupied territory, but not the way Israel's enemies mean it. The occupation started in 1948 when Jordanian forces stormed in immediately after Israel declared its independence, and presided over a massacre of the Jewish farmers who worked the previously-barren land. The occupation ended in 1967 when Israeli forces recaptured it from the Jordanians, who subsequently relinquished any claims to the area in 1988. The Gush Etzion land including Bat Ayin was legally, lawfully and with no controversy purchased by Shmuel Yosef Holtzman in 1930, as Soccer Dad takes the trouble to point out today.

It's difficult not to be bitter about how today's act of child-murder, and the many, many that have come before it arouse such confused, confusing and morally-ambivalent reactions. So long as journalists, analysts and politicians find it so difficult to unambiguously damn the perpetrators of such savagery, terrorism will go on and on.

In this regard, note please the total silence from responsible Arab leaders when it comes to condemning acts of murder directed at children in this ongoing war. And if we're factually wrong about this, please let us know. As parents of a child murdered by jihadists, and as witnesses to the double-speak that emerged in its wake, we have a vested interest in speaking out about this catastrophic reality and trying to sensitize people to what it means not only to us but to them, their societies and their lives.

9:30pm UPDATE: When you're completely immersed, as the members of the Hamas regime are, in acts of savagery that define your very essence, then murder is just another of many actions that you embrace for their expedience. Thus, tonight, a spokes-thug for the Gazan government justified the unthinkable with these comments captured by the Jerusalem Post: the axe-murder "was simply a natural response to the Israeli "occupation"... committed in the framework of the resistance". It "is a reaction to the continuing occupation and the continued building of settlements... It is our right to defend ourselves and to act in every way and with every means at our disposal in order to defend ourselves." The words quoted are those of Hamas goon Ayman Taha. But his "we have no choice" values, attitudes, justifications can heard coming from the mouths and word processors of a depressingly long list of people who ought to know much better.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

26-Mar-09: Unmasking the hatred behind the hatred

We have re-published several of Khaled Abu Toameh's analytic pieces here in the past. His is an invaluable and rare voice - that of a proud Muslim and Palestinian Arab, a talented, intelligent and insightful man, who eschews the language of extremism and of prejudice. These days he writes for the Jerusalem Post, but his journalistic career began in the service of the Arafat regime.

He observed the reality around him there - and walked. From hearing him in person, we understand he is among those rare individuals who understand the reality, the threat posed by the corruption, the self-serving prejudice and the myopia of generations of truly awful leadership among his people.

Earlier this month, he traveled in the United States and wrote about it on the Hudson New York website. Forces at work among America's emerging elite and especially among its university under-graduates and faculty-members serve as deeply disturbing signs of a hate-driven malaise. Khaled Abu Toameh's short essay deserves the widest distribution.

On Campus: The Pro-Palestinians' Real Agenda
Khaled Abu Toameh
March 24, 2009

During a recent visit to several university campuses in the U.S., I discovered that there is more sympathy for Hamas there than there is in Ramallah.

Listening to some students and professors on these campuses, for a moment I thought I was sitting opposite a Hamas spokesman or a would-be-suicide bomber.

I was told, for instance, that Israel has no right to exist, that Israel’s “apartheid system” is worse than the one that existed in South Africa and that Operation Cast Lead was launched only because Hamas was beginning to show signs that it was interested in making peace and not because of the rockets that the Islamic movement was launching at Israeli communities.

I was also told that top Fatah operative Marwan Barghouti, who is serving five life terms in prison for masterminding terror attacks against Israeli civilians, was thrown behind bars simply because he was trying to promote peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

Furthermore, I was told that all the talk about financial corruption in the Palestinian Authority was “Zionist propaganda” and that Yasser Arafat had done wonderful things for his people, including the establishment of schools, hospitals and universities.

The good news is that these remarks were made only by a minority of people on the campuses who describe themselves as “pro-Palestinian,” although the overwhelming majority of them are not Palestinians or even Arabs or Muslims.

The bad news is that these groups of hard-line activists/thugs are trying to intimidate anyone who dares to say something that they don’t like to hear.

When the self-designated “pro-Palestinian” lobbyists are unable to challenge the facts presented by a speaker, they resort to verbal abuse. On one campus, for example, I was condemned as an “idiot” because I said that a majority of Palestinians voted for Hamas in the January 2006 election because they were fed up with financial corruption in the Palestinian Authority. On another campus, I was dubbed as a “mouthpiece for the Zionists” because I said that Israel has a free media. There was another campus where someone told me that I was a ‘liar” because I said that Barghouti was sentenced to five life terms because of his role in terrorism.

And then there was the campus (in Chicago) where I was “greeted” with swastikas that were painted over posters promoting my talk. The perpetrators, of course, never showed up at my event because they would not be able to challenge someone who has been working in the field for nearly 30 years.

What struck me more than anything else was the fact that many of the people I met on the campuses supported Hamas and believed that it had the right to “resist the occupation” even if that meant blowing up children and women on a bus in downtown Jerusalem.

I never imagined that I would need police protection while speaking at a university in the U.S. I have been on many Palestinian campuses in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and I cannot recall one case where I felt intimidated or where someone shouted abuse at me.

Ironically, many of the Arabs and Muslims I met on the campuses were much more understanding and even welcomed my “even-handed analysis” of the Israeli-Arab conflict. After all, the views I voiced were not much different than those made by the leaderships both in Israel and the Palestinian Authority. These views include support for the two-state solution and the idea of coexistence between Jews and Arabs in this part of the world.

The so-called pro-Palestinian “junta” on the campuses has nothing to offer other than hatred and de-legitimization of Israel. If these folks really cared about the Palestinians, they would be campaigning for good government and for the promotion of values of democracy and freedom in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Their hatred for Israel and what it stands for has blinded them to a point where they no longer care about the real interests of the Palestinians, namely the need to end the anarchy and lawlessness, and to dismantle all the armed gangs that are responsible for the death of hundreds of innocent Palestinians over the past few years.

The majority of these activists openly admit that they have never visited Israel or the Palestinian territories. They don’t know -and don’t want to know - that Jews and Arabs here are still doing business together and studying together and meeting with each other on a daily basis because they are destined to live together in this part of the world. They don’t want to hear that despite all the problems life continues and that ordinary Arab and Jewish parents who wake up in the morning just want to send their children to school and go to work before returning home safely and happily.

What is happening on the U.S. campuses is not about supporting the Palestinians as much as it is about promoting hatred for the Jewish state. It is not really about ending the “occupation” as much as it is about ending the existence of Israel.

Many of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas officials I talk to in the context of my work as a journalist sound much more pragmatic than most of the anti-Israel, “pro-Palestinian” folks on the campuses.

Over the past 15 years, much has been written and said about the fact that Palestinian school textbooks don’t promote peace and coexistence and that the Palestinian media often publishes anti-Israel material. While this may be true, there is no ignoring the fact that the anti-Israel campaign on U.S. campuses is not less dangerous. What is happening on these campuses is not in the frame of freedom of speech. Instead, it is the freedom to disseminate hatred and violence. As such, we should not be surprised if the next generation of jihadists comes not from the Gaza Strip or the mountains and mosques of Pakistan and Afghanistan, but from university campuses across the U.S.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

22-Mar-09: In Haifa, the terrorists were out of luck tonight

A reminder, yet another, of what it means to be living in a neighbourhood where terrorism and savagery erupt whenever civil society looks the other way.

In Haifa tonight (Saturday), Israel Police explosives experts neutralized multiple bombs concealed in a vehicle parked just outside the very busy Lev Hamifratz shopping mall. The mall was evacuated and police activity caused heavy traffic delays in the area. Dozens of kilograms of explosives were found - enough to cause extensive damage and loss of life if they had not been detected and safely detonated. One report says the explosives were packed into 14 black bags inside a rucksack.

Haaretz says the attack began around 8pm Saturday night with a small explosion near a Subaru parked in a lot adjacent to the shopping center. Police were called and they found several explosive devices hidden in the vehicle. At this hour (Sunday morning, 1:00 am) there is a court gag order on further details of the case.

A notification from an Israeli Arab organization styling itself "Galilee Freedom Brigade" (alternatively 'Galilee Freedom Battalions' according to YNet) has claimed responsibility for the attack. It's not clear whether such a group exists. A similar name was used a year ago when Palestinian Arabs sought to grab some of the 'glory' from the massacre of high school students in Jerusalem Merkaz Harav seminary.

The Lev Hamifratz (literally "heart of the bay") shopping mall is a transport hub, located adjacent to a major train station with lines running north to Nahariya and south to Tel Aviv, and next to the Mifratz Central Bus Station, between Haifa's Krayot northern suburbs and Haifa itself. The building has 3 floors of stores, a food court, an underground parking garage, and an above ground parking garage.

Saturday nights are the busiest of the week, as they are for malls throughout Israel. Which makes them the ideal strategic target for jihadist barbarians with access to explosives.

Coping with the dangers posed by this sort of routine terrorism depends on there being adequate awareness of the facts. Sadly, the absence of dead and maimed Israelis almost certainly means this latest near-atrocity will go largely unreported outside Israel.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

19-Mar-09: Kauft Nicht Bei Juden

The author of the letter below (reproduced here with his permission), a member of the faculty at one of Israel's first-rate universities, says what needs to be heard, in a straightforward and powerful way.

Open Letter to Boycotting British Scientists
Emeritus Professor Kenneth Preiss
Ben Gurion University of the Negev
17 March 2009

When the German government of the 1930's forbad the teaching of "Jewish science" such as relativity, they were operating rationally within their perverted frame of logic. In a rationality accepted by most of the public, including scientists, Jews had been deemed to be a pestilent menace. For the sake of humanity they needed to be eliminated from every aspect of society, and the urgency of this mission took precedence over the search for scientific truth.

This policy was based on a lie, and we know now that in its treatment of the Jews, Germany lobotomized itself. Germany has to this day not returned to the standing it had then in the scientific world. It does not escape attention that a country that in the 1920's was at the pinnacle of scientific achievement, by the 1940's had plunged to the lowest depths of vile, cruel and immoral wickedness. If this happened in Germany, it can happen elsewhere.

This is what comes to mind when I hear of the proposal to boycott the presentation of Israeli scientists at the venerable Science Museum near my fondly remembered alma mater of Imperial College. Israelis are tired of justifying themselves to the world. Israelis, both as individuals and as a society, do much for the less fortunate of the world and they do so because this is their character, not for approval of others.

Despite the ongoing quest by the Arabs to destroy Israel, this includes infrastructural, medical, trade, scientific and cultural assistance to many, including the Palestinians – a group that has brought upon themselves much suffering but manages to convince a willing world that its problems are due to others. This is not the place to amplify upon this matter that has been written about abundantly elsewhere. In today's world many people prefer to remain ignorant of that reality. It is enough to wander around any Israeli hospital, enquire where the staff and patients come from, and see the equality of treatment each gets, irrespective of whether they are Jews or Arabs.

Free and honest debate would show that Israel treats the Palestinians better than any other nation would, including the British. The Palestinians have much to thank Israel for, even though mendacity about this subject seems to fill the airwaves, the Internet and newspapers. As for the mini-war in Gaza I cannot recall a conflict in which the party attacked and defending itself adhered so assiduously to the laws of war while the aggressor so blatantly disregarded those laws. In the Orwellian reports of that war the roles have been reversed.

The text below shows the process we observed in the 1930's and where it led, and the parallel process observed today.

In 1929 a very serious global financial crisis started.
In 2008 a very serious global financial crisis started.

Over the next decade a medium sized power (Germany) armed in contravention of international agreements, threatened its neighbors, and used latent and overt hate of the Jews locally and world-wide to strengthen its standing.
A medium sized power (Iran) is arming in contravention of international agreements, threatens its neighbors, and uses latent and overt hate of the Jews locally and world-wide to strengthen its standing.

The world powers, led by England, tried to convince Germany to cease its threats. Appeasement did not work.
The world powers try to convince Iran to cease its arming and its threats. Appeasement is not working.

At the end of the decade a world war started that lasted 6 years and in which 56,000,000 people, 2.2% of a world population of 2,500,000,000, died.
Does history repeat itself? If so, 150,000,000 people, 2.2% of the world's current population of 6,700,000,000 , will die.

In the decade leading to World War 2 there were those who said that war was inevitable, but no one anticipated, nor could even imagine, the enormous scale and cruel depravity inherent in that catastrophe.
There are those who say that war is now inevitable, but even they do not anticipate, nor can they imagine, the enormous scale and cruel depravity that would be inherent in that catastrophe.

We understand in retrospect the process that led to the tragedy called World War 2. Had that prior process not existed, the trigger that included Austria, Italy, Czechoslovakia, Chamberlain, Churchill and Poland would never have materialized. We do not know whether we are now in a process that could lead to over 100 million cruel deaths, and if we are we certainly do not know what will trigger that war.

In light of the proposed boycott of Israeli scientists it is worth remembering that it was difficult for German scientists to oppose the boycott of Jewish scientists in the face of German public opinion. Had they done so the chain of events that led to World War 2 may have been diverted. If indeed we are now in a process where eventually an unpredictable event will trigger the tragedy of World War, you the boycotting British scientists, probably unsuspectingly, will have been part of that process.

You have stepped onto the slippery slope.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

14-Mar-09: While everyone's looking the other way: missiles keep being fired into Israel

Two rockets, and perhaps more than 2, landed on Israeli soil this evening. Ynet calculates that this brings the number of rockets and mortar shells fired from Gaza at Israeli civilian targets, mainly in Israel's south, since the end of Operation Cast Lead in Gaza to about 100. (In a separate calculation, the New York Times on Wednesday said the total then was 160, including mortars.)

One of tonight's rockets landed near a kibbutz. Another struck an open area south of the city of Ashkelon.

Yesterday, Friday, three additional Qassam rockets fired by Palestinian Arab terrorists with Israeli-civilian-only targets in mind, shooting from the northern part of the Gaza Strip, landed in areas known to Israelis as the Sha'ar Hanegev and Eshkol regional councils.

Yesterday's edition of the Christian Science Monitor puts the current situation in a rare perspective (see "Israeli town copes with return of near daily rockets"). Rare, that is, in the sense that mostly the mainstream media are ignoring the effects of the steady barrages directed from Gaza by Palestinian Arab terror groups against Israeli civilian communities.

And when they don't ignore it, it's in order to make disingenuous comparisons between the lopsided death toll on the Israeli side, and the number of deaths of Gazan Arabs resulting from Israeli military intervention this past December and January. Jimmy Carter's disgraceful, error-laden January opinion piece in the Washington Post is a good example.

This ongoing war in which rockets, mortars and other forms of lethal flying explosives are hurled into our towns and homes requires hard-eyed examination of the realities on the ground. The Hamas terrorist regime in control of Gaza does what it does because it receives constant encouragement and support from outside, allowing it to turn Gaza into one of the world's most miserable locales. The jihadists who stand at its head have been successful at almost nothing other than sacrificing the children and lives of the populace under their control in the name of religiously-inspired, endless war against Israel. More foreign aid has been delivered per capita to the Palestinian Arabs than to any other population in history. The outcome has been pathetic, tragic.

A meeting of select Western governments in London on Friday has evidently decided to prevent the Hamas regime from getting access to additional weaponry. Members of NATO (the US, Canada, Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Norway) say they will "share more intelligence information, exert more diplomatic pressure and intercept more weapons shipments coming over land and by sea to Gaza". We'll see.

The Hamas terrorists have reacted exactly as terrorists do. They say ("Hamas vows to continue smuggling weapons") the plan will fail, and they will continue to smuggle arms by whatever means into their territory. To the credit of the jihadist savages, they have never minced words. They say what they mean. Unfortunately too many of the people and governments hearing them either confuse their own wishful thinking for serious analysis. Or, like the mullah-directed regime in Iran, they sympathize and actively collaborate.

Friday, March 13, 2009

13-Mar-09: On lying down with dogs

The New York Times is reporting today that the Obama administration is "puzzled" that Britain is "re-establishing contact with the political wing of the militant group Hizbullah".
"The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the matter, said the British government had informed the “previous administration” of its diplomatic overture, suggesting that the Obama administration felt somewhat blindsided by the initiative. The United States, the official said, wanted Britain to explain “the difference between the political, social and military wings of Hezbollah because we don’t see the difference between the integrated leadership that they see.”
The trouble with having an inconsistent policy in relation to terror organizations - like Hamas and Fatah - that get involved in conventional politics is that you end up confusing your citizens and your allies and, no less, yourself.

The issues that arise are unpleasant to the point of being deeply offensive. In the case of Hezbollah, for instance, the American official:
objected to the glorification in the Hezbollah stronghold of south Beirut of Imad Mugnieh, a Hezbollah commander who was killed in a car bombing in February 2008 that the movement blamed on Israel. "For years Hezbollah denied having any knowledge of Imad Mugnieh, for years Hezbollah pretended that Imad Mugnieh and that whole era of Hezbollah was not really Hezbollah, it was something else," the official said. "And now all over south Beirut are all these posters extolling the virtues of Imad Mugnieh," said the official of the man who made America's most wanted list for his role in anti-US and anti-Israeli attacks in the 1980s and 1990s. When a journalist suggested he did not sound happy with the British decision, he replied: "No."

The threat posed by the terrorists to civilized societies all over the globe demands that people in power get this right. Getting it consistently wrong, as for instance the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has done in its six year-long "intensive investigation" of Iran is not a more politically-motivated error. It's an existential disaster in the making.

Ongoing glorification of barbarism, and of the savages (like the man who murdered our child and his numerous accomplices) and jihadists who perpetrate it, are part and parcel of the process of pretending that groups like Hamas and Fatah have conventional, civilized legitimacy. We allow this to continue to happen at our mortal peril. The British government owes an explanation for its moral blindness to more than just its own citizens, but at least to them.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

12-Mar-09: Neighbourhood watch

A small reminder of what it means to be living side by side with a culture - that of the Palestinan Arabs in the era of Hamas and Fatah - that constantly encourages and nurtures acts of personal terrorism.

Alert police tonight (Wednesday) here in Jerusalem spotted a terrorist en route to carry out a stabbing. Haaretz says the would-be martyr is a young woman and that, as happens frequently, she confessed her plan on being arrested. She was spotted in Jerusalem's Old City near the entrance to the Temple Mount, with an essential item of religious worship on her body: a kitchen knife like those used in so many previous killings of Israelis. Two police officers patrolling the area spotted her, recovered the knife and took her into custody.

Three days ago, on Monday, Israeli police arrested two young Arab men carrying a commando knife in the Pisgat Ze'ev neighborhood of Jerusalem. They too admitted their plan to carry out a stabbing attack on Israelis.

Terrorism like these acts rarely gets reported outside Israel.

Monday, March 09, 2009

9-Mar-09: "I was born into a Bedouin tribe..."

The myth of Israel's discriminatory "apartheid" policies is being aggressively peddled throughout the world by its enemies. Most of those who buy this popular canard are entirely ignorant of the truth about Israeli society. They have never heard about the equal opportunities and rights enjoyed by Israelis of myriad races, religions and creeds. Additionally, most of those who embrace this myth are clueless about the repressive and dictatorial governments ruling in every one of Israel's neighbors. Worse, these critics of Israel make no effort to remedy their ignorance.

Israeli Jews who attempt to inject some truth into the "apartheid" debate are dismissed as biased. Hence, the following defense of Israel's civil rights is invaluable. It is written by a very brave Arab Israeli. Unafraid of breaking ranks with most of his brethren, he publicly sings Israel's praises.

Lost in the blur of slogans
Ishmael Khaldi
Wednesday, March 4, 2009

For those who haven't heard, the first week in March has been designated as Israel Apartheid Week by activists who are either ill intentioned or misinformed. On American campuses, organizing committees are planning happenings to once again castigate Israel as the lone responsible party for all that maligns the Middle East.

Last year, at UC Berkeley, I had the opportunity to "dialogue" with some of the organizers of these events. My perspective is unique, both as the vice-consul for Israel in San Francisco, and as a Bedouin and the highest-ranking Muslim representing the Israel in the United States. I was born into a Bedouin tribe in Northern Israel, one of 11 children, and began life as shepherd living in our family tent. I went on to serve in the Israeli border police, and later earned a master's degree in political science from Tel Aviv University before joining the Israel Foreign Ministry.

I am a proud Israeli - along with many other non-Jewish Israelis such as Druze, Bahai, Bedouin, Christians and Muslims, who live in one of the most culturally diversified societies and the only true democracy in the Middle East. Like America, Israeli society is far from perfect, but let us deals honestly. By any yardstick you choose - educational opportunity, economic development, women and gay's rights, freedom of speech and assembly, legislative representation - Israel's minorities fare far better than any other country in the Middle East.

So, I would like to share the following with organizers of Israel Apartheid week, for those of them who are open to dialogue and not blinded by a hateful ideology:

1) You are part of the problem, not part of the solution: If you are really idealistic and committed to a better world, stop with the false rhetoric. We need moderate people to come together in good faith to help find the path to relieve the human suffering on both sides of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Vilification and false labeling is a blind alley that is unjust and takes us nowhere.

2) You deny Israel the fundamental right of every society to defend itself: You condemn Israel for building a security barrier to protect its citizens from suicide bombers and for striking at buildings from which missiles are launched at its cities - but you never offer an alternative. Aren't you practicing yourself a deep form of racism by denying an entire
society the right to defend itself?

3) Your criticism is willfully hypocritical: Do Israel's Arab citizens suffer from disadvantage? You better believe it. Do African Americans 10 minutes from the Berkeley campus suffer from disadvantage - you better believe it, too. So should we launch a Berkeley Apartheid Week, or should we seek real ways to better our societies and make opportunity more available?

4)You are betraying the moderate Muslims and Jews who are working to achieve peace: Your radicalism is undermining the forces for peace in Israel and in the Palestinian territories. We are working hard to move toward a peace agreement that recognizes the legitimate rights of both Israel and the Palestinian people, and you are tearing down by falsely vilifying one side.

To the organizers of Israel Apartheid Week I would like to say: If Israel were an apartheid state, I would not have been appointed here, nor would I have chosen to take upon myself this duty. There are many Arabs, both within Israel and in the Palestinian territories who have taken great courage to walk the path of peace. You should stand with us, rather than against us.

This article appeared last week in the San Francisco Chronicle.

Thursday, March 05, 2009

5-Mar-09: Bull

It's difficult to convey to people living far from here just how appalling, sickening, infuriating it is when hate-driven terrorism happens again and again and again and again. The lessons are so clear to those of us living under its influence - and evidently so baffling to many of those who do not.

This afternoon (Thursday), the calm routine of our home town of Jerusalem was brutally assailed again. And again it was done by an ordinary-looking Palestinian Arab operating a bulldozer and driven by a grotesque, jihadist version of Islam.

A man called Marei Radaydeh, a construction worker in his mid-20s who lived with his wife and young child in Beit Hanina, a suburb of Jerusalem just a few minutes from our home, was killed by alert police and passers-by around 1 o'clock today.

The killing saved many lives because it happened while this man called Marei, a Koran on the seat next to him according to Haaretz which quoted Israel Police, was furiously engaged in ramming his yellow construction vehicle into the people traveling inside cars and buses on the city's main freeway, just a short walk from its main shopping center.

This man called Marei brought his bulldozer (he was its registered owner - certainly not a poor man or a desperate man, just a hatred-filled man) all the way across Jerusalem, along the Menachem Begin freeway.

He used the bulldozer's front blade to flip over a first vehicle, continuing along the road at high speed while dragging the car and its occupants (who fortunately escaped serious injury). Then he turned his attentions to a bus which, unknown to him, was without passengers. He would have continued, but several armed Israelis from different directions used their weapons to send the man to his virgins.

This was the fourth bulldozer attack by Palestinian Arabs against ordinary Israelis in less than 12 months.
  • In July 2008, a Palestinian Arab went on a rampage on Jaffa Road, using his bulldozer;s front blade to crush several people, killing three and injuring dozens more. He was shot dead at the scene.
  • Two weeks later, a Palestinian Arab from East Jerusalem carried out a similar attack, wounding at least 24 people. He was shot dead at the scene.
  • In September 2008, another Palestinian Arab from Jerusalem plowed his car into a crowd of young soldiers on their way to a ceremony at the Western Wall. He was shot dead at the scene.
Reminding us of why they are terrorists, the Hamas regime that rules Gaza issued a statement this afternoon praising the savage and his actions. This was a "natural response" to Israeli actions, the Hamas spokesthug said, providing a useful insight into how a society ruled by a religious clique formulates its morality. Can heart-tugging pictures of the noble martyr's widow, child, grandmother and dog be far behind? (Sadly no. See below.)

And reminding us why the "moderates" of the Mahmoud Abbas regime are anything but moderate, their information minister said today the terror attack in Jerusalem was a mere "traffic accident". Though it sounds like a Saturday Night Live routine, the Fatah flack next demanded an investigation into why the driver had been shot. It's highly likely the UN Security Council will very shortly accommodate him.

The late, distinguished Israeli diplomat Abba Eban understood the black humour of being surrounded by fanatical enemies for whom reality was whatever they demanded it to be, and whatever the media would be willing to swallow. If an Arab state introduced a resolution at the UN declaring the earth was flat, said Eban, it would pass by a vote of 164 to 13 with 26 abstentions along with a declaration that Israel had flattened it.

Eban might have smiled to see global news networks like AFP, describing today's attempted mass murder as an act of "terror" - with the quotation marks reminding readers that it's really only the Israelis who think that's what it was.




Leave it to the mainstream media to scratch around for a sympathetic side to these stories of ordinary, hate-filled terrorism. You can't make this stuff up. Keep in mind this photo is now being syndicated to news media throughout the world, and is likely to become the image that untold numbers of news consumers will associate with the cold-blooded attack on a Jerusalem road today.

Sunday, March 01, 2009

1-Mar-09: More

Having just viewed BBC Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen interview Tony Blair on BBC World news in Gaza, and finding ourselves seething over the sadly familiar tone of "look what those rapacious Israelis have done to the poor Gazans yet again", we find it necessary to remind our readers of this morning's news, and yesterday's and last week's etc etc.

Yet another Gazan-Palestinian Qassam rocket launched from Hamas-controlled territory exploded in Israel this morning, this time on the Ashkelon beach.

Yesterday (Saturday) ten additional Gazan-Palestinian Hamas missiles were fired into Israel from the barbarian regime's armed camp. These brought the total number of explosive projectiles hurled at Israeli civilians from Gaza since the start of the absurdly-named "truce" to more than 60.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

21-Feb-09: Reality check - is this what mainstream media are saying?

Hamas announced on January 18 that it was entering into a ceasefire with Israel. To no one's particular surprise, there were some 10 mortar firings plus one Qassam rocket shot into Israel yesterday (20th February). Palestinian terror groups have fired more than 50 rockets into Israel from Hamas-controlled Gaza since the Hamas "cease [and] fire" charade.

Despite the persistent attacks on Israeli civilian targets by the Gazans, Israel continues to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza residents. Since Israel ended its defensive operation there, more than 100,000 tons of aid and more than 2 million gallons (9 million liters) of fuel have entered Gaza. The aid reaches Gazans via several border crossings, including the Nahal Oz fuel depot, a site Palestinian terrorists have attacked repeatedly in the past.

With the December/January Gaza battle fading into the past, painstaking Israeli investigation reveals that fewer than a third of the Gazan casualties during Israel’s operation there were civilians. More than 1,200 Palestinians were killed during the three-week operation, according to the Israeli study. Two thirds of the deaths were of combatants, notwithstanding deliberately false reporting by Hamas that was swallowed up by most of the world's media.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

11-Feb-09: Erasing the Line Between News and Opinion

An opinion piece written by one of this blog's two authors appears on the FrontPageMag.com website. It is cross-posted below.

Erasing the Line Between News and Opinion
By Frimet Roth
FrontPageMagazine.com | 2/11/2009

Israel's media terrain is overrun with guilt-ridden writers. Rain or shine, war or lull, they put pen to paper and beat our national chest.

Normally the results of their self-reproach are relegated to the opinion pages where they rightly belong. But two of Israel's harshest critics receive very different treatment.

Gideon Levy and Amira Hass write columns for Israel's leading Hebrew-language daily, Haaretz. The agenda they blare in their newspaper articles, interviews and lectures proves beyond a doubt that they are political activists. And yet in the pages of Haaretz this pair is consistently referred to as journalists, reporters or analysts. Moreover, their writings often appear as hard news and always enjoy prominence.

Hass' and Levy's articles focus on the suffering of the Palestinians in minute detail and are generally devoid of context. On the other hand, both writers thoroughly ignore the deaths and injuries of their fellow Israelis.

This is probably easier to do for Hass, who has resided in Gaza and Ramallah, detached and estranged from her people, for the past fifteen years. But Levy, a Tel Avivan, does a thorough job of it as well. Hass favors a dry style of writing; Levy tends to the melodramatic. Both rely primarily on anecdotal evidence gleaned from speaking with Palestinians. Those sources are often anonymous yet their accounts are deemed entirely credible by Hass and Levy. And by their editors. And, eventually by their trusting audiences throughout the world.

What is confounding is that Hass herself has written matter-of-factly about Hamas' brutality towards it own people. During the Gazan war, she reported
"Hamas has sought to suppress individuals it believes endanger the group's fight against Israel and its hold on power…since the operation began… Hamas operatives have executed several people it classified as collaborators… estimates… range from 40 to 80… Executions are carried out secretly… Hamas is continuing to arrest those it suspects of criminal activity or Fatah membership... No one knows where the detained are being held… common methods include confiscating cell-phones, beatings, house arrest and firing at a suspect's legs."
Such revelations are not surprising; Hamas' tyrannical rule over Gaza has been well documented.

Khaled Abu Toameh reported in the Jerusalem Post that Hamas tortured and executed other Palestinians in Gaza during and after Operation Cast Lead. He quotes a PA government minister confirming that nineteen victims were killed in cold blood. 60 others were shot in the legs.

Even a spokesman for the Hamas-run Interior Ministry in Gaza, Ihab Ghissin, has conceded that his men had arrested scores of "collaborators" with Israel during the war.

Der Speigel's correspondent, Ulrike Putz, wrote that one Gazan confided: "Many people are now against Hamas but that won't change anything. Because anyone who stands up to them is killed." Putz' source, who refused to give his name, added, "There will never be a rebellion against Hamas. It would be suicide."

In this environment of repression and fear, an obvious inference would be that Gazan sources do not speak freely. Yet both Hass and Levy routinely convey Gaza-sourced testimony as incontrovertible. And the Haaretz editors reinforce this when they present it in their news section.

Are they deluded into accepting this duo as objective professionals? They have no grounds for that belief.

In August 2001, Hass confessed to the Independent/UK: "There is a misconception that journalists can be objective… But being fair and being objective are not the same thing. What journalism is really about – it's to monitor power and the centers of power."

The damage they wreak on Israel's image cannot be over-stated. For instance, a Hass article entitled "Norwegian doctor: Israel used new type of weapon in Gaza", relays uncritically the allegations of two Norwegian doctors, Erik Fosse and Mads Gilbert who were in Gaza for 11 days during Operation Cast Lead. She quotes them saying "Some Palestinian casualties in the Gaza Strip were wounded by a new type of weapon that even doctors with previous experience in war zones do not recognize".

Hass writes that Fosse declared "if we hadn't been there to confirm their testimony, it would all have been presented as Hamas propaganda."

In truth his testimony is the propaganda, with Hass and her editors providing credibility and cover.

Hass rarely provides the identifying particulars of her sources. But in a letter to Haaretz, Yonatan Levi notes a September 2001 interview published in a Norwegian daily, in which Gilbert is asked whether he supports the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States. His reply: "I am upset over the terrorist attack, but am equally upset over the suffering which the United States has created… Terror is a bad weapon, but the answer is yes, within the context I have mentioned."

Gilbert acknowledges that he cannot separate politics from his profession: "There is little in medicine that is not politics".

Thanks to Hass, Fosse's and Gilbert's allegations against the IDF are presented as news by Haaretz.

In the lexicon of Amira Hass, there is no terrorism. "I'm not sure I approve of the very term 'terror'" she said in an interview with Matthew Rothschild on the Progressive radio station in April 2008. "Let's talk about killing."

In that and in her many other appearances, Hass presents a creative chronology of events in this region. For instance, she claims that there were no suicide bombings until the killings carried out by Baruch Goldstein in the Machpelah sanctuary in 1994. Prior to that, she instructs, there were "a few" suicide bombings but they were all "only against soldiers and settlers".

When addressing foreign audiences, the anti-Zionist Hass likes to refer to Jews as a "diaspora nation". In 2005 she participated in a debate arranged by the Evening Standard, a London newspaper. She defended the claim that "Zionism is the worst enemy of the Jewish People"… and led her team to victory.

A recent addition to the cadre of anti-Israel radicals masquerading as reporters is the Swedish freelancer, Catrin Ormestad.

Ormestad has lived in Israel since 1993 but does not hold Israeli citizenship. Since 2006, when Israel restricted travel by Israelis into Gaza, Ormestad has visited Gaza frequently. Numerous accounts of her forays there have appeared in Haaretz. At times they are published under her byline. At others they are referred to by Levy in his own pieces. Her Swedish surname probably leads readers to presume she is an unaffiliated reporter.

In fact, Ormestad moonlights as what has been called "a militant Swedish journalist from the Swedish Palestine Solidarity Association". She edits that organization's newsletter, "Nu Palestine", and appears overseas at conferences, sometimes alongside her colleague, Gideon Levy.

In Savigliano, Italy, Ormestad, Levy and two other journalists lectured at a symposium entitled "Ethos and Religion: The Case of Israel". An Italian newspaper reported that in they "unambiguously and repeatedly described the State of Israel as 'racist', 'colonial', 'imperialist', 'Nazi' and of pursuing a policy of 'ethnic cleansing' and 'apartheid worse than originally practiced by South Africa'.

True to form, following the recent Gaza fighting, Ormestad wrote: "The head of the Burn and Plastic Surgery Department, Nafiz Abu Shaban, says he has no doubt that all these burns were caused by white phosphorus." Ormestad ignores the fact that Hamas leaders were and are hiding in the hospitals from which this and other doctors spoke to her.

At Haaretz, her reports are carried as unequivocal news. Nothing she has written has ever appeared as an op-ed.

Haaretz' embrace of these agenda-driven activists has far-reaching repercussions.

Several days ago a Croatian newspaper questioned the Israeli Ambassador to Croatia, Shmuel Meriom, about "an article by Gideon Levy [in the Israeli daily Haaretz] who thinks that after Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, it will be necessary to start a new trial in the Hague, this time against Israel."

Last week, Hass earned a half-page in Haaretz' news section for her piece "Life in Gaza Is Not 'Back to Normal'". There, she reports that journalists, volunteer doctors, architects who specialize in rehabilitation of disaster zones and jurists aiming for war crimes trials in international courts of justice are flooding the Strip. Hass relates that it is "emerging as patterns, phenomena that repeat themselves: bombing of buildings and enterprises that have no connection to the Hamas infrastructure – politically or militarily."

That assertion, central to the global media attacks on Israel, is sandwiched between Hass' descriptions of Gazan loss and destruction. But she offers no proof for the claim which has been repeatedly and categorically denied by the IDF.

In the same article, Hass writes that many Gazan families boast that their dead relatives were Hamas militants when, in fact, they died in their homes and "did not even know how to shoot a rifle. This and similar dubious anecdotes appear as pure fact on page 4 of the clearly-designated News Section of the weekend edition.

Haaretz' presentation of such shoddy reportage as reputable journalism is inexcusable. Many people subsist on a strict diet of Middle East reporting based on Hass' and Levy's version of events. Those readers are key players in the massive global media attack confronting Israel in the wake of the Gazan war. And the role of Haaretz' editors, as Hass' and Levy's enablers, cannot be overlooked.

----

Frimet Roth, a freelance writer, lives in Jerusalem. She and her husband founded the Malki Foundation in their daughter's memory. Malki Roth was murdered at the age of fifteen in the Sbarro Jerusalem restaurant massacre in 2001. The foundation in her name provides concrete support for Israeli families of all faiths who care at home for a special-needs child.
  • Some background on Jews and Jewish history
  • May we suggest some practical actions that honor the memory of our daughter?