16-Feb-17: When they talk to Arabic-speaking audiences, a different message about terror and a two-state solution

A Nov. 2012 Gaza City rally honoring an Arab military victory over Israel

Shaath, and to his left, Hamas chief Haniyeh, Islamic Jihad arch-terrorist

Mohammed Al-Hindi and Ahmed Bahar of the Palestinian Arab

parliament, Gaza City [Image Source: Reuters]

While impassioned speeches about a "two state solution" to the Arab/Israel conflict remain in the air, we think it's useful to publicize the views of one of the most central figures in the Palestinian Arab political firmament.

We're speaking about Nabil Ali Muhammad Shaath, also known as Abu Rashid, who has been the foreign minister of Palestinian Authority (between April 2003 and February 2005, the first person to occupy that office), a cabinet minister in the Palestinian Authority regime, the Acting Prime Minister of the Palestinian National Authority, a member of Fatah's Central Committee and currently the Commissioner of the Fatah Department of International Relations (whose website, we see today, has been hacked, evidently by pro-Israel vandals).

Shaath has established himself as an important Palestinian leader with close ties to European and other governments. He maintains a strong relationship with President Abbas but is viewed by a large part of the Palestinian public as corrupt. Still, he has never having spent time in prison, unlike most Fatah Central Committee members. He has developed a substantial fortune and owns an excellent collection of Palestine stamps. [Fatah Central Committee Profiles, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2015] 

Shaath is a figure of top-level seniority. He's also well-educated, having gotten both a masters degree and a doctorate from the University of Pennsylvania. The consulting firm he established in the mid-seventies, TEAM International, is well-known and successful. What he says has significance.

So we're indebted to the good people at Palestinian Media Watch for translating into English the hateful and dangerous Shaath bombast reproduced below. They were recorded when Shaath was interviewed on Awdah TV, which PMW calls a Fatah channel, on January 23, 2017.

Watch it (above) and you will see Shaath manage three times in the course of a very brief interview to justify a claimed Palestinian Arab right to use what he terms "armed struggle", a well-established euphemism for terror.

"Our cause is just. Our right to the armed struggle is an indisputable right. The Israelis didn't come here through negotiations. They did not come at our request. They are usurpers who came with weapons to murder and tried to expel [us]. They succeeded in expelling a large part of our people by force. Therefore, our right to the armed struggle is indisputable... We are humane people. We want to liberate our homeland. After we liberate our homeland, we will have no problem with living in a democratic state in which Jews, Muslims and Christians live - in a Palestinian Arab democratic state... [As a Palestinian] - your cause is just. You are occupied. Your land was stolen. Your rights were taken. Therefore, I've never seen any problem with carrying out the armed struggle while diplomatic and political activity supporting your cause is being carried out." [Awdah TV, January 23, 2017]

Reaching for lethal violence - stabbings, shootings, bombings, truck-rammings - is an "indisputable" right, he asserts. Resorting to it is justified because it enables Arabs to "liberate our homeland". And once that liberation process runs its course, in Shaath's way of looking at things, a "Palestinian Arab democratic state" will then exist within whose borders Muslims, Christians and Jews will party together or something similar.

This is the kind of blather that Arab political figures reserve for their Arabic-speaking audiences. It used to have little traction or credibility outside those circles. But that has changed.

It's worthy of note that Shaath's speech puts the lie to numerous public undertakings given by Fatah and the PLO to stop doing terror at various points in the past three decades. Those commitments were a quid pro quo for things the Palestinian Arabs wanted to achieve in their political campaigning.

PMW refers to several key Palestinian Arab commitments to stop terror:

• "The PLO renounces the use of terrorism and other acts of violence and will assume responsibility over all PLO elements and personnel in order to assure their compliance, prevent violations and discipline violators." [Source: Arafat to Rabin, Letters of Mutual Recognition, Sept. 9, 1993, attached to the Oslo Accords] 
• "1. Both sides shall take all measures necessary in order to prevent acts of terrorism, crime and hostilities directed against each other, against individuals falling under the other's authority and against their property and shall take legal measures against offenders." [Oslo Accords ARTICLE XV]  
• "2. Both sides will, in accordance with this Agreement, act to ensure the immediate, efficient and effective handling of any incident involving a threat or act of terrorism, violence or incitement, whether committed by Palestinians or Israelis... Each side shall immediately and effectively respond to the occurrence or anticipated occurrence of an act of terrorism, violence or incitement and shall take all necessary measures to prevent such an occurrence." [Oslo Accords Annex I, ARTICLE II]

Just how solidly does Shaath support the idea of a two-state solution? You can judge for yourself from this subtly-titled video:

"We Will Never Accept the "Two-States for Two Peoples" Solution to the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict". [ANB TV, Lebanon/London via MEMRI, July 13, 2011

Shaath's exhortations to violence over the years have had little impact on the public relations people at University of Pennsylvania, Shaath's alma mater, who wrote of Shaath that he "has devoted decades his life working toward peace between the Israelis and Palestinians" ["A Palestinian Voice for Peace", Wharton School, 2007].

We're guessing they don't speak Arabic.

29-Nov-13: Rare insider's insight into how the Abbas regime views chances of achieving peace with Israel (hint: don't hold breath)

Times of Israel's interview with Shaath is here

A person would have to be entirely disconnected from the news emanating from this part of the world, or an employee of the US State Department, to be unaware of the rising levels of terrorism (yes, rock-throwing at speeding cars meets every element of the definition of terrorism, even when some of the throwers are minors) that endanger the lives of ordinary Israelis on a daily basis.

Notwithstanding, the government of Israel entered into an undertaking during this past summer to free from its prison some 104 killers, every one of them convicted on one or more counts of willful homicide, and - as far as anyone can tell - entirely unrepentant.

(Here's a sampling of those acts of "courage" for which they were sent to long terms behind Israeli bars: "30-Oct-13: The bogus manufacture of heroes and legends" - and trust us when we say, on the basis of many meetings with politicians, journalists and opinion-makers: outside of a small circle of us here in Israel, plus of course regular readers of this blog, the crimes of the 104 are mostly not known and not understood, especially by people who claim that they do know and do understand.)

Even if some of them genuinely were ready to own up to the horrors of which they were convicted by judges and courts, which is a theoretical possibility, the reception extended to them in the most public way by the despicable political leadership of the Palestinian Arabs has turned them into heroes with fat, foreign-aid-funded salaries. (We have more about those salaries here: "10-Nov-13: Who finances those savage acts of terror? And why is this so poorly understood?") Not one of them is ever going to say "I did terror, and I deeply regret what it did to my soul and to the ethos of my people". Not now, not ever.

The reason why Israel agreed to free the 104, and in fact has already set loose 52, depends on whom you want to believe. 

• Israel says it was to prod the Arab side into resuming the diplomatic negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. ["28-Oct-13: It's official: 26 more convicted killers to be handed over to PA and Hamas"] And having agreed back in June, its revised position in October (see here) was "promises must be kept".
• The PA [see "25-Aug-13: Wake up call for those who thought the terrorists are walking free for peace"] says the release of Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails was unrelated to the launching of the peace talks. Abbas has repeated this mantra over and again. Evidently it's important to him.
• The Israeli media from one end to the other of the political spectrum say what Israelis know: it's all about pressure from the US.
• And the US State Department says: "19-Aug-13: Is the US State Department breaching its own policy on Palestinian Arab terrorists?"] it's an Israeli decision, taken entirely by Israel and essentially not a matter on which the State Department has a view. As we also noted  here ["14-Aug-13: Making 'peace' by celebrating the murders of children and of Holocaust survivors"] the US says it respects "the exclusive right of the Israeli government to make these decisions”. Its spokesperson said "Israel alone made the decision to release the prisoners". 
• To further emphasize this, the State Department says it officially has no opinion as to whether those 104 killers of elderly pensioners, Holocaust survivors, US citizens, women, children, fellow Arabs are (a) freedom fighters, (b) political prisoners or (c) terrorists. We're beyond being astounded by this instance of State Department disingenuousness. It distresses us almost as much as the silence of Americans who know about it and do nothing. We're particularly bothered, as we have written in this blog and Tweeted over and again, by the studied know-nothingness on this matter of the US Secretary of State's Deputy Spokesperson, Marie Harf. 

Now hold all those thoughts for a moment.

This afternoon (Friday) the Times of Israel is running a front-page story by Ilan Ben Zion, its news editor, in which Nabil Shaath, a perennial PA insider (with the personal wealth to prove it), Fatah Central Committee Member, and "close advisor" of PA president Mahmoud Abbas. The headline:

Palestinian official says peace talks already failed | Fatah bigwig says if it weren’t for Palestinian prisoners to be released from Israeli jails, PA would have ended talks already [Times of Israel, today]

Shaath, who ought to be believed, firmly sticks a pin in the balloon of the hope addicts: “We are committed to negotiations for a nine-month period and are waiting until all 104 prisoners are released” he declares, at the same time helpfully clarifying that

if it weren’t for the release of prisoners, which has been conducted in stages over the course of the negotiations, the Palestinians would have already terminated the talks and sought statehood recognition with UN bodies... The Palestinian Authority has refrained from abandoning the US-brokered peace talks and “breaking the dishes” because of the remaining Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons. “But I don’t think there’s much more to be done with the present Israeli government’s policies,” he said.

In light of this unusually candid admission from the highest level of the Palestinian Arab kleptocracy, those who executed master terrorist Yasser Arafat's last will and testament and who have presided over the relentless descent of the PA to its current depths, we are left with this one question:

What kind of self-respecting Israeli political leadership would play along with a charade that calls for the release of yet another tranche of convicted, unrepentant murderers in the coming days when the serial promoters and glorifiers of terrorism (meaning the PA leadership) explicitly put the lie to the basis on which those releases - comprehensively rejected by the Israeli public - are carried out?

We are among the few writers who have publicized the extent of the support Israelis give to our government's strategy of freeing convicted killers. Readers who can give a hand in letting more people know about this will earn our enduring gratitude. Here are some links to get started: "28-Jul-13: Releasing unrepentant killers: a massive 9.4% of Israelis are in favor". And "6-Aug-13: Scale of Israeli public's rejection of terrorist deal far greater than most reports disclose".