hit counters To rate us on JBlog, please click here.

Thursday, August 10, 2006

10-Aug-06: Reacting to a "Thwarted" Terrorist Plot That Remains "Imminent"

The major report from London this morning (BBC headline: 'Airlines terror plot' disrupted) is still unfolding. But it raises some questions for people like us who have experienced terrorism and think about it a great deal.
  • The words "militants" or "activists" appear nowhere in any report. "Terror" or "terrorist" or "terrorism" feature prominently in all reports. Appropriate for us to remind our friends at the BBC and the British media not to lose sight of the BBC's guidelines, online here, which provide: "TERROR: We must report acts of terror quickly, accurately, fully and responsibly. Our credibility is undermined by the careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgements. The word "terrorist" itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding. We should try to avoid the term, without attribution. We should let other people characterise while we report the facts as we know them."
  • If you're watching BBC World on television right now, you'll get the message immediately. No matter what the BBC's guidelines say, on screen right now and for the past hour, in gigantic white letters on a bright scarey red background are the words TERROR PLOT. And rest assured, the word TERROR is not in quote marks. (And neither should it be.)
  • If the plot was thwarted - a word that is being endlessly repeated in the British television reports on our screens this morning - why has the security alert level in the UK been pushed up just now to its highest possible setting - "critical" meaning an attack is expected imminently, according to the BBC. Suggested interpretation: when it's being done to you and your family, you don't take chances. We absolutely agree that if there is an imminent threat of something awful, every possible security measure has to be taken. But then stop claiming it was thwarted. At best, it was discovered, and the real work is still ahead. You're at war.
  • On the other hand, there has not been a single victim at this stage. Not one person wounded unless the police 'inquiries' led to some bruises or breaks among the suspects. Not one person killed. So we sincerely hope the British don't over-react. Or, Heaven forfend, react, disproportionately.
  • The images of thousands of innocent people at Heathrow, lining up to go nowhere, make us wonder whether the authorities are taking the right approach to security. Profiling is a way of pre-selecting people who, by their behaviour or appearance or background, represent a larger potential risk. At Ben Gurion airport, where some of the most effective flight security in the world is done, 'selectors' (that's the Hebrew word) interrogate travelers and watch their reactions and body-language before opening or checking a single bag. There may be some lessons which Israel's experience with terrorism can offer the rest of the world.
  • The media are repeating how successful this uncovering of a plot is, how the investigations have been going on for a long time, how good the intelligence work was. But if so, why is the entire British airline system now in total chaos with no plan for the immediate future. We're not blaming anyone other than those trying to claim this is a victory. Terrorism is going on almost everywhere, all the time, and the terrorists are way ahead.
  • All the attention is on the airports, specifically Heathrow. And there are suggestions of liquid explosives are at the heart of the plot. So... why does anyone assume only aircraft, and only Heathrow, and only the UK are at risk? Why not trains, subways, buses, schools, hospitals, water supply sources?
  • The most useful quoted statement we have heard in all the noise of this morning is a British policeman saying that this is about "mass murder on an unimaginable scale". The sad truth is that terror is always about the unimaginable, and always will be, no matter how creative our imaginations.
  • The British TV news programs are also emphasizing in the past hour the massive disruption to ordinary life, especially to the tens of thousands of people now stuck in the airports or on board planes that have not been unable to unload. This will not continue for more than a matter of hours - unlike the acute security situation here where it has gone on for a month or more, as has been the case for hundreds of thousands of Israelis in northern communities, and for millions throughout the rest of Israel. Some Brits are likely to be in a much better position now or soon to understand why Israelis are demanding of their leaders to take out the militants, the activists, the terrorists, the mass murderers.
  • We note that the words "Islamic" and "Moslem" have not been mentioned in any of the reports. This is good, right and proper. What possible connection would anyone imagine there might be between Moslems and a massive threat of terror? The last thing on anyone's mind.
The war against the terrorists is a real war, as real as the Battle of Britain was, as real as the Hezbollah War is, as real as the Arafat War (some call it the Second Intifadeh) is. In war, you do what you need to do to win. When it is not happening to you, you can engage in silly rhetoric and superficial phraseology. When it is happening to you, your children, your home, your society, you do what you need to do. The terrorists understand that better than the rest of us.

Comments on "10-Aug-06: Reacting to a "Thwarted" Terrorist Plot That Remains "Imminent""

 

Blogger Gharqad Tree said ... (Thursday, August 10, 2006) : 

If only you were right in your conclusion: the mass murder of 50 Londoners has done nothing to change mainstream opinion, so it's unlikely that another terrorist atrocity in London will change anything.

We already know what the response will be - Britain's foreign policy and failure to demand an immediate Israeli surrender - er, sorry, ceasefire - are to blame for the terrorist actions. Yes, yet again we will have brought it on ourselves.

One of my good friends happens to work for the BBC. Last weekend I ovherheard her telling an Arab friend, 'The more I study the trouble in the Middle East, the more I study the history, the more I realise that it's mostly Britain's fault for creating all these countries artificially and colonially'.

Yes, maybe we did, but when a grown man acts like a spoilt thug and still blames his parents for all his own faults, we are entitled to call him a spineless coward. My friend illustrated perfectly the BBC mindset which implies that muslims or Arabs can never really be morally accountable or answerable for their own actions; that they are mere puppets whose every action must be evaluated in relation to some Western action or policy.

In short, whatever the British public might think in the aftermath of a terrorist atrocity, the BBC will become the Blame Britain Corporation, as it did on the day of the London bombings last year, when, even before the bodies were cold, and while hundreds of fearful Licence-Fee payers were desperately scrambling to find out if loved ones were dead or alive, the BBC was already airing the view that we had brought it on ourselves, and warning that the muslim population of Britain could - in the event of a hypothetical backlash - become the 'real' victims of that day.

In fact, I fear that a reaction to a new London atrocity would be the opposite of that which you hint at. I was in California the day after the September 11th attacks on New York and the Pentagon, and one acquaintance remarked to me, 'I think a lot of people will now wake up to the fact that the creation of the state of Israel was a big mistake'. (Needless to say, he is no longer an acquaintance of mine). I have little doubt that a mindset already entrenched against Israel will see any muslim or Arab atrocity as yet more proof that Israel should be thrown to the wolves to appease the murderers.

I sincerely hope I am profoundly wrong.

 

Blogger John Barnabas said ... (Thursday, August 10, 2006) : 

You have so rightly pointed out the ironies in the situation. When I listened to the news on BBC radio this morning, the situation at the airports in the UK was the top story, pretty much the only story. The Hezbollah War had dropped to third in the running order, having dominated the news here for days and days on end. (It got to the point where I could hardly bear to listen to the BBC reports or watch the BBC news on TV because of all the lies and distortions that kept being repeated.)

The reaction to this terror plot (apparently it's OK to use "terror" and "terrorism" when it affects us directly, even it "shouldn't" be used with reference to other parts of the world where it also clearly applies) strikes me as a kind of "headless chicken" reaction. Passengers at Heathrow and other airports who were interviewed this morning had no idea what was happening - nor, indeed, did the airlines, as far as I can tell.

I and members of my family have travelled through Ben Gurion on a number of occasions and I have great admiration for the security system there. You know that it's going to take time to get through the security checks, but you accept it and feel safer, despite the continuously high level of security threat that Israel suffers. The system at Ben Gurion is rigorous and effective, even if there are sometimes "false positives", as when something in the structure of my suitcase caused concern in January and the empty suitcase was taken away for further examination, and with a very Israeli kind of courtesy (i.e. not smarmily polite as we might get here in the UK, but direct and effective). My suitcase was returned intact and repacked carefully by the security staff, who then conducted me to check in - so clearly a concern was still there.

I think we could learn a great deal from what happens at Ben Gurion (I love the new termnal building, by the way).

As to the wider points: yes, this is a global war against an often unacknowledged (in the UK at least) enemy - people dare not name names or attribute blame, for fear of being labelled Islamophobic; but the UK establishment mindset will likely remain unchanged, as Gharqad Tree points out (even while the Battle of Britain was going on, there were Nazi sympathizers in the UK, some of them in high places) - the appeasement tendency is always present in UK political life and has been very strong in recent years.

I've just finished reading "Londonistan" by Melanie Phillips and I'm in the middle of "Celsius 7/7" by Michael Gove, a Conservative MP and writer on terrorism. I would say that "Celsius 7/7" is the more measured book, but like "Londonistan" it pulls no punches in showing the reality of the exceedingly dangerous situation the world is in. The back blurb puts the blame fair and square where it belongs:

"Fundamentalist Islam has been in arms against us for over a decade. But the scale of the conflict we face is still imperfectly grasped, the battle-lines still only hazily perceived, the nature of the enemy repeatedly and often wilfully, misunderstood."

This is a well researched and well written book with an excellent summary of how political Islam has developed in the world. It clearly shows the weakness and hollowness of Western political thought and leadership in dealing with (or failing to deal with) the threat from political/ideological Islam, yet another totalitarian force in the world, in succession to Communism and Nazism.

Religion, in a highly distorted and ideological form, is the cause of our world situation. The Baha'i writings refer to religious extremism as "a world-devouring fire" and very specifically forbid "every form of fanaticism, hatred, dissension and strife" in matters of religion. Ironically, religion is going to provide the only solution. As with Hitler and the Nazis, appeasement and accommodation lead only to further demands. The ultimate aim was then (and is now) not to gain this or that bit of territory but to dominate the world and impose an ideology on the world's peoples. Therefore there is no political solution that will stick and be sustainable. Who can negotiate with those who demand that Israel be wiped off the map?

So we have to look to something deeper in humankind, something that will tap the wells of human nobility and goodness. Only when the world's peoples recognize their oneness in a deep way, only when they accept that all the great religions come from one Divine source, only when they understand that religion itself evolves to meet the changing needs of different times, will we have any hope of a lasting peace in the world.

In the meantime, the government of Israel, like the government of any state, must remain committed to defending the lives of its people. The Baha'i writings prescribe collective security in dealing with international conflicts, but it is not at all clear that the conditions for effective and just international security currently exist. So Israel must defend itself. That's its right under international law.

 

Blogger TheSarc said ... (Thursday, August 10, 2006) : 

New Article: Terrorists "1 for 2" in Airline Murder Plots, Tie Breaker set for 2011

 

Blogger Mladen said ... (Thursday, August 10, 2006) : 

The BBC is still refusing to name who the 18 ‘characters’ are , The BBC site reads: “Sources told the BBC the "principal characters" suspected of being involved in the plot were British-born, and some have links to Pakistan “ Sky News, on the other hand, explicitly said that the perpetrators are 18 British born young Muslims .

When the BBC, one of the most influential news organizations in the world, is lying about the main news item of the day one has to ask oneself how do the Brits accept it? Are they embarrassed ? Do they really think that it does not matter whether the plotters were Buddhists or Muslims? How can they continue to support the organization which
dissembles in one of the most important questions of our time . Do they honestly believe that BBC ,which looks more like al- Jazeera than al- Jazeera every day, is defending British interests by lying? How far down the road of Eurabiazation had Britain progressed – it seems irreversibly so.

A normal society would take this last episode and make changes immediately. I wonder if Britain would do anything even if 3000 passengers were blown up over the Atlantic by these ‘principal characters’?

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (Friday, August 11, 2006) : 

As I understand BBC policy:  it is only terror if it is aimed at Britons or takes place on British soil. Otherwise, it is militancy. Exceptions might be made for the step-children - the Americans, but not for the brats - the Israelis.  

 

Blogger Whispering_Jack said ... (Friday, August 11, 2006) : 

The terrorism itself is big part of the story but there's more to it than that. The fact is that our society is being slowly brainwashed to the view that some terrorism in the world is acceptable - along with the intimidation and blackmail that comes with it.

As I drove into work this morning I wasn't surprised when the first caller I heard on our national radio station came up with the old chestnut about the fact that this is all due to the anger of the "Arab Street" and that everything would be fine and dandy if only they resolved the "plight of the Palestinians". Like, er the Palestinians just elected a government that wants to kill the Jews and Israel just elected a government that stood on a platform of giving most of the West Bank to the Palestinians and anyway, will that stop the terrorists from having designs on ancient Andalucia?

I just received an email from a friend who lives in Haifa. He and his wife live in a beautiful apartment on Mount Carmel and their balcony overlooks the bay and, in the distance, you could see the blue of Lebanon. I recall the last time we took in this stunning view, he told me about the missiles that Hezbollah possessed out there in the distance and how they might fire them at civilian targets if they had the opportunity.

I remember saying to him that I thought the world would not accept or tolerate any group that deliberately fired missiles at civilian targets, that the world is too civilized and that we're not living in Second World War Europe.

Judging by the indifference of the world to what Hezbollah is doing in Israel and in Lebanon and how there is an outcry only against Israel's acts of self defence I can only say that I am humbled and I was wrong.

 

post a comment
  • Some background on Jews and Jewish history
  • May we suggest some practical actions that honor the memory of our daughter?