Robust, noisy, vigorous: Israel's media. |
We noted how much of the funding that
makes their temper tantrums possible comes from the United States and its
taxpayers. We also referred to the distinctive form of last
week’s celebration of press freedom in the world of the Palestinian Arabs.
UNESCO says the other part
of the Palestinian Arab government, the one controlled by the Hamas regime,
will also be "celebrating" World Press Freedom Day in Gaza on
May 10. Elder of Ziyon, a sharp observer of the cynicism that accompanies
public life in both of the Palestinian Arab polities, notes how very odd this is:
Hamas routinely attacks Gaza journalists and who disagree with its policies. Right now, there is no freedom of the press in Gaza and reporters self-censor out of fear for their lives. They have beaten journalists who try to cover anti-Hamas demonstrations, they have banned Fatah newspapers from Gaza, and they have even attacked documentary filmmakers.
This past October, the terrorists of
Hamas engineered a forcible takeover of the Gaza
headquarters of the Palestinian Journalists' Syndicate. Then in
March, Hamas "security forces" physically attacked
three journalists while they were covering a Gaza City event,
assaulting and beating them. [See this Palpress report in Arabic.] If
you look at the names and professional affiliations of the victims, you might
be persuaded to expect some kind of global media outcry: Muhammad Masharawi, a
reporter for SKY News (who suffered the additional indignity
of being abducted by the Hamas thugs
immediately afterwards); Adnan al-Barsh who reports for the BBC;
and a journalist by the name of Amer Abu Omar.
As far as we can tell (and we're open
to being corrected) neither SKY nor BBC gave any coverage at all to what was
done to their own people. Sadly, there's a long tradition of foreign news media
hushing up the intimidation their field people experience in the dark corners
of the Arab world.
Israel, with its robustly open and
unrestrained media channels, comes in for what we consider unfair criticism
from certain quarters. Though it ranked first in the Middle East and North
Africa group analysis of Freedom House this year,
and was the only country in the region that received a “free” rating, Israel
gets plenty of flak. For instance, the press freedom index published by
Reporters Without Borders put Israel at number 92 in 2011, a drop of six places from the year
before. Our sense is that some of the negativism is based on distortion and
misuse of statistics (here’s a cogent analysis). Some of it, we
believe, is tainted with straight-forward malice.
But we think it's instructive to dig
below the data. Understanding the case of one particular journalist whose
story has never properly been told, but who has been featured in reports of how
Israel infringes the freedom of the Palestinian press, might be helpful in this
respect.
In 2001, when this woman was 21 years
old, she worked as an on-camera news reader for PA Television's evening news,
based in Ramallah. Several days after 9/11, the Israelis arrested her and
subsequently she spent time in prison. It’s reasonable to assume that her case
would - and in fact it did - attract criticism of the kind that is frequently
directed at Israel: the alleged abridgement of the freedom of working
journalists to do their all-important reporting work, oppression, harassment
etc etc.
She was eventually released. Since
February 2012, her career has been on a sharply-upward trajectory. She got her
own glossy television program that is beamed by satellite every Friday night
into all parts of the Arabic speaking world via the Al-Quds TV channel. That's one of two
global-facing television channels operated by the Hamas terrorist regime; the
other is called Al-Aqsa TV.
Her weekly program,
"Naseem Al Ahrar" (translation: “Breezes of the Free”) focuses
on the injustices allegedly visited on Palestinian Arab prisoners
languishing in Israeli custody.
All in all, it would be fair to say
that at the age of 31, this woman possesses one of the most prominent
and influential platforms that an Arabic-only journalist could ever dream of
having.
In the screen shot below she is reading the evening bulletin
on a Palestinian Arab television news program beamed from Ramallah's Al-Istiqlal station on Thursday August 9, 2001.
The demands of journalistic objectivity
meant that, whatever personal feelings she must have had, were kept under
control, sheathed and hidden. But ten years on, we know something now
about those repressed and unseen passions.
That’s because this journalist is a
woman called Ahlam Tamimi. She was the planner and engineer of the massacre about which she
laconically reported in the evening news. It was she herself who had
placed the bomb that ripped through Sbarro, a pizza restaurant in the center of
Jerusalem earlier that afternoon.
The bomb, who had been a human being
until 2:00 pm that afternoon (no misprints here - read it again), had been
‘enhanced’ with steel balls and nails to enlarge the impact on passers-by. And
indeed it had that effect. 130 people were mutilated and maimed. Fifteen more
were killed including our
teenage daughter Malki. Most of the dead were children, like
Malki. A sixteenth person, a young mother who had popped in to the Sbarro
restaurant that day for a quick lunch with her two year old daughter, suffered
severe injuries and has remained comatose for the ten years since then. Her
daughter is now twelve and is being raised, alone, by her father.
That most of the dead
and injured were women and children is mostly due to Tamimi's diligence. In accordance with the instructions of her Hamas masters,
she herself in the couple of days before the attack had walked around downtown
Jerusalem looking for, and finding, a target for the massacre (as she herself
has said on public video) that had the optimal concentration of Jewish women
and children.
She has boasted on television that her
priority was to find a restaurant that not only attracted Jews but that
attracted religious Jews, Orthodox Jews. They were her
principal target, she said. And for this purpose, Sbarro – with its
well-advertised, highly-stringent kosher supervision - fit the bill.
Tamimi the journalist, no longer
bareheaded and dressed like a Westerner but now attired in the shape-concealing
garb and head covering we associate with Islamist females, is free as a bird
to travel wherever she likes. She got out of prison, despite the thousand-plus
year sentence, in October 2011. Today she has a Facebook page, an army of
supporters and acolytes, a highly public persona, large and enthusiastic
audiences.
If the circles in which she moves had a
culture of idolizing female rock singers, Tamimi's standing would be on that
level. But they don't. What they have is Tamimi. When her appearances are
announced, the crowds gather. She embodies something profound and powerful for
a large and very specific segment of the world's population: a literally-lethal
blend of Joan of Arc and pop diva.
It's arguable that no murderer
in history has had as much opportunity as Tamimi to unashamedly claim credit
for the killings of which she was charged, tried and convicted.
Certainly
no one who was sentenced to sixteen life terms in prison has ever been
interviewed as a perfectly free citizen (of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan,
for the record), openly exulting in her 'achievement', asserting again and
again that what she did was right, proper, good, justified.
And encouraging
others to do what she did - to kill.
"I dedicated myself to the path of jihad for the sake of Allah, and Allah granted me success… Do you want me to denounce what I did? That's out of the question. I would do it again." [Video interview recorded in Jordan, October 2011]
“It was a calculated act, performed with conviction and faith in Allah… Jihad warriors are always ready to die as martyrs, to be arrested - or to succeed. I managed to overcome the barrier of prison and was released. Why should I repent?" [Video interview recorded in Jordan, November 2011]
Are we overstating any of this, or its
impact? Let whoever knows of such statements send us a link to a public
statement in the Arabic language - written or spoken - expressing
embarrassment, regret, even discomfort, at the emergence of this
woman as a hero of her people. Even a statement simply criticizing her and the
murders she executed. From anywhere, just so long as it appeared in Arabic.
This woman's horrifying career and its
impact on the world she occupies throws more light on the life and values of
our neighbors than a free press alone, which they have never had, would or
could.
1 comment:
justice, in this world, is powerless to fully punish this terrorist. (and, one must regret the staggering confusion and the monstrous stupidity that led to the terrorist's release.) nonetheless, to the extent that justice can be brought to this terrorist, it should be. she and her collaborators should be made to drink deep from that cup.
Post a Comment