A pity the article does such a characteristically poor job of setting the context and proportions, 'forgetting' for instance to mention the death, by Hamas rocket just two weeks ago, of an innocent farm worker on the Israeli side of this highly dangerous frontier. (Reminder to BBC editors here.)
Also a shame that the BBC's reporters and editors persist in depicting the now-near-daily terror attacks emanating from the jihadist lair of Hamas-controlled Gaza in such mendaciously misleading ways. Today's report helpfully explains the background this way: "On Wednesday, they [unidentified "militants" in customary BBC double-speak] fired a rocket into an empty field in southern Israel, but there were no reports of casualties or damage, military sources said."
Nonsense. The terrorists of the jihadist regime in Gaza have never fired into empty fields.
That their explosive-packed rockets sometimes land there rather than in Israeli schoolyards, agricultural greenhouses or among their own long-suffering Gazan brothers and sisters (a regular phenomenon almost uniformly unreported) is fortunate for us. Their intentions are always far more deadly and calculated than this, as the BBC's editors of course know but routinely conceal.
And as the BBC also knows, the capabilities of the Hamas terrorists go well beyond rockets.
News reports yesterday disclosed that the Egyptians "discovered a large weapons cache in an underground storage area in the Sinai peninsula", right next to some "13 underground tunnels running between Sinai and the Gaza Strip". The Egyptians maintain a blockade against the terrorist Hamas regime in Gaza but the BBC routinely reports only that Israel, not Egypt, does this. See a sidebar in today's BBC report by its Jerusalem man, Jon Donnison here where he writes: "Gaza remains under an Israeli economic blockade..." There is zero likelihood that he is unaware of the Egyptian blockade. But it is unmentioned.
When you paint a conflict in completely bogus "suffering innocent victims" terms, as the BBC habitually does when reporting on events in and near Gaza, you need to let your readers understand why the innocents (that would be the Gazan Palestinian Arabs) suffer and who causes them to suffer (that would of course be the Israelis). The BBC's correspondent writes that "these [today's Israeli] strikes were on a relatively small scale". Nevertheless the strikes constitute the largest news story in the world, as of this hour.
This is evidently what it means (see the BBC's mission statement) to deliver "programmes and services that inform, educate and entertain". The world's news consumers deserve much better.
UPDATE Friday 2.30pm: Yet another Gazan Palestinian Arab explosive projectile was hurled over the border into Israeli space in the past couple of hours. Fortunately this one, too, landed in an open space but this was not the intention of the terrorists. The BBC, as of this writing, has no mention of this on its news site. Its visitors will not know that this afternoon's attack is the 35th terrorist rocket to have been fired in the general direction of Israeli towns and communities in the month of March alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Like many sites that advocate for a moderate, Israel-friendly viewpoint, we unfortunately receive abusive, offensive and racist messages on a routine basis. We want it to be clear that we reserve the right to reject them in our absolute discretion. Racist and Israel-hating sites abound on the web. So not being allowed to play in our sandbox can hardly be called a hardship. Anonymous postings or messages where email address of the poster is hidden from us will generally not be accepted.