Monday, December 14, 2015

14-Dec-15: What do the Palestinian Arabs think?

Election posters, Ramallah [Image Source: a 2006 article]
Almost three months ago, we wrote here ["22-Sep-15: What do the Palestinian Arabs think?"] about a public opinion survey conducted among Palestinian Arabs by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (the PSR), headed by a respected pollster, Dr. Khalil Shikaki.

That made-by-Palestinian-Arabs poll of Palestinian Arab opinion, the 57th such poll conducted by that firm, gave expression to what we called
data-backed insights into what the people on the other side of the boundary say they feel when they are talking to their own rather than to the BBC or France24.
The PSR's 58th poll was released today. 1,270 adults were interviewed face to face in 127 locations in the so-called West Bank and the Gaza Strip. (Claimed margin of error, 3%.)

Some key points:
  • Two-thirds demand that Mahmoud Abbas, who was elected in January 2005 to a four-year term as president of the Palestinian Authority and has held tenaciously onto power for eleven years with no election on the horizon, must resign
  • If, which seems unlikely, presidential elections were held today, the Hamas candidate would win a clear victory against Abbas. 
  • There's no room for doubt that terrorism has the Palestinian Arabs firmly in its grip. The numbers show clear, unambiguous and widespread support for a violent, armed intifada against the Israelis: 60% support it today, up from 57% in the PSR September 2015 poll.
  • The cohort most opposed to a two-state solution and most supportive of "an armed intifada and stabbings" is the one aged between 18 and 22. 
  • Two-thirds of Palestinian Arabs say they are in favour of stabbing attacks on Israelis. There's no number published for how many of them support those other violent means (shootings, vehicle-rammings, nuclear bombs, poisoning the wells.)
  • The two-state solution, so admired by peace-oriented outsiders (like the Obama administration and the EU) and by 63% of Israelis in a 2013 poll, is rejected by a growing majority of Palestinian Arabs (54% today; 51% in the September 2015 poll.)
(Readers might want to try to grapple with what Palestinian Arabs mean when they say, as many do, that they oppose terror.)

Our conclusion after reviewing today's poll is the same as the conclusion we posted here three months ago:
When columnists and analysts speak of the desire of Palestinian Arabs to live in peace, to get on with ordinary, quiet, constructive lives - as compelling as this interpretation is, the data don't support it. Anyone paying attention to the incitement pumped, generation after generation, into their communities and heads will not be surprised.
Since we wrote that, the Palestinian Arab stoning/ramming/shooting/stabbing war against Israelis has erupted and continues to rage, with the Abbas regime providing much of the incitement that fuels it. Ignoring what Palestinian Arabs say to their own pollsters - which we see political leaders and commentators doing when they propound certain kinds of rosy Middle East visions and bitter criticisms of Israel - is a huge mistake.

What the people living on the other side of the fence are saying is clear, credible and measurable. Being optimistic about the prospects for the sort of painful compromise that leads to peaceful relations is counterfactual and foolish, as much as we wish it were otherwise. That's something we wish the public figures pushing their "peace" "plans" would internalize.

It also means cruel and vicious attacks like tonight's car-ramming assault on unarmed Israelis standing at a bus stop are certain to continue. So too will the disgraceful glorification - by the entire Palestinian Arab power structure starting with its double-talking president - of the terror-minded attackers and those who step into their shoes once they are eliminated.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Like many sites that advocate for a moderate, Israel-friendly viewpoint, we unfortunately receive abusive, offensive and racist messages on a routine basis. We want it to be clear that we reserve the right to reject them in our absolute discretion. Racist and Israel-hating sites abound on the web. So not being allowed to play in our sandbox can hardly be called a hardship. Anonymous postings or messages where email address of the poster is hidden from us will generally not be accepted.